Writ Jurisdiction Barred After GSTAT Becomes Functional

1. The Core Dispute: Writ Remedy vs. Statutory Appeal

The petitioner challenged a demand order passed under Section 73 (for FY 2019-20) which was subsequently affirmed by the first appellate authority. At the time of filing the writ petition, the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) was not functional, leaving taxpayers without a statutory second appeal forum.

Petitioner’s Stand: Since the Tribunal was non-functional, the petitioner was “remediless,” making a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the only available relief.
Revenue’s Stand: During the pendency of the writ, the GSTAT was formally constituted and operationalized. Therefore, the petitioner must now follow the statutory route, including the mandatory pre-deposit requirements.

2. The Legal Ruling: Constitution of GSTAT and Functional Timelines

The Court examined the impact of recent notifications and the launch of the GSTAT e-filing portal.

I. Termination of Writ Maintainability

The Court held that writ jurisdiction is an exceptional and residual remedy. It was entertained solely due to the absence of the Tribunal to prevent a failure of justice. Once the GSTAT became functional and the portal was launched (with specific timelines for filing), the rationale for bypassing the statutory remedy ceased to exist.

II. Staggered E-Filing Windows and Extensions

The Court took note of the “User Advisory for GSTAT Portal” and the Central Government notification (S.O. 4220(E)) dated September 17, 2025.

Special Filing Window: A final deadline of June 30, 2026, was notified for filing appeals against orders communicated before April 1, 2026.
Staggered Filing: To manage system load, filings were initially scheduled in windows based on the date of the first appeal (ARN/CRN). Although the President of GSTAT initially issued a staggered schedule, it was clarified that missing a window does not bar filing later, provided it is done before June 30, 2026.

3. Pre-Deposit: A Mandatory Condition

The Court emphasized that taxpayers cannot use the writ jurisdiction to escape financial obligations.

Section 112(8) Requirement: No appeal can be entertained by the Tribunal unless the appellant pays the admitted tax/penalty in full plus 20% of the remaining disputed tax (in addition to the 10% paid at the first appeal stage).
Strict Compliance: The Court directed that the petitioner must strictly comply with this pre-deposit. If any amount was deposited under interim High Court orders, it could be adjusted toward the statutory pre-deposit.

4. Final Order and Direction

The High Court declined to keep the writ petition pending and issued the following directions:

Remand to GSTAT: The petitioner was directed to file a statutory appeal before the GSTAT.
Limitation Protection: If the appeal is filed within the notified extended timeline (by June 30, 2026), the GSTAT shall entertain it without objecting on the grounds of limitation.
Merits Reserved: The Court expressed no opinion on the merits of the demand, leaving all factual and legal disputes to be decided by the Tribunal.

Key Takeaways for Taxpayers

GSTAT is Operational: The “Tribunal not constituted” defense for filing writs has effectively expired as of late 2025/early 2026.
Deadline for Legacy Cases: For all orders received before April 1, 2026, the absolute last date to file a second appeal is June 30, 2026.
Mandatory 20% Deposit: Ensure you have the funds ready for the additional 20% pre-deposit; the Tribunal will not hear the case without it.

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA

Shiva Prasad Pattnaik

Commissioner, Commercial Tax & GST, Odisha^*

Harish Tandon, CJ.
and MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.

W.P.(C) No. 17390 of 2023

FEBRUARY 2, 2026

A.S. Mohanty, Adv. for the Petitioner. Seshadeb Das, Additional Standing Counsel for CT & GST Department for the Opposite Parties.

ORDER

1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 25^th July, 2022 passed by CT & GST Officer, Bhubaneswar-II Circle, Bhubaneswar for the tax periods from April, 2019 to March, 2020 under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “GST Act”), which was affirmed in an appeal by the Appellate Authority on 27^th March, 2023.

2. According to learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, although the remedy by way of an appeal is provided under Section 112 of the GST Act under the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) against the order in appeal, such remedy is not available as the GSTAT has not been constituted and made functional and, therefore, an aggrieved person cannot be rendered remediless.

3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the CT & GST Department corroborated the aforesaid stand of the petitioner so far as it relates to non-constitution and non-functional of the GSTAT, but arduously submits that it does not absolve the aggrieved person in complying with the mandate envisaged under sub-section (8) of Section 112 of the GST Act putting a restriction in filing the appeal unless the appellant paid in full, such part of the amount of tax, interest, fine, fee and penalty arising from the said order as admitted by him and a sum equivalent to ten per cent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute subject to a maximum of twenty crore rupees.

4. It would be apposite to quote the said provision, which runs thus:-

“(8) No appeal shall be filed under sub-section (1), unless the appellant has paid—

(a) in full, such part of the amount of tax, interest, fine, fee and penalty arising from the impugned order, as is admitted by him, and

(b) a sum, equal to ten per cent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute, in addition to the amount paid under sub-section (6) of Section 107, arising from the said order, subject to a maximum of twenty crore rupees, in relation to which the appeal has been filed.”

4.1. It has been brought to our notice that the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance issued a notification being S.O. No.4220(E) dated 17^th September, 2025 providing an opportunity to an aggrieved person to file an appeal in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. 2017 in the following:

“In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section(1) of Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), the Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby notifies the 30^th day of June, 2026, as the date upto which appeal may be filed by the Appellate Tribunal under this Act in respect of all cases where the order sought to be appealed against is communicated to the person preferring the appeal before the 1^st day of April, 2026 and all appeals in respect of order communicated on or after 1^st April, 2026 may be filed before the Appellate Tribunal within three months from the date on which such order is communicated to the person preferring the appeal.”

4.2. Apropos the same and in order to facilitate smooth filing of an appeal before the said Tribunal, a “User Advisor for the GSTAT eFiling Portal” is also issued by the authorities containing the timeline within which the appeal can be filed before the GSTAT in the following:

“User Advisory for the GSTAT E-Filing Portal

Please note that this advisory is only a snapshot for the entire appeal filing process. For detailed understanding and in order to have a seamless experience on the portal, users are advised to refer to the E-filing user manual, FAQs and user videos.

Important Timelines

Staggered Filing Period (Until December 31^st, 2025):- The filing window for second appeals filing is based on staggering of the ARN/CRN of first appeal filed in APL-01/03 before the Appellate Authority or the notice in RVN-01 issued by the Revisional Authority. The system first validates the ARN/CRN date and only upon successful validation of the date of the ARN/CRN of the APL-01/APL-03/RVN-01, the appellant can proceed further to Login/Registration. The schedule for filing is as follows:

TABLE

Sl. No.	Period of filing appeal in Form APL-01 or APL-03 under section 107 of the Act or issuance of notice in Form RVN-01 in terms of section 108 of the Act.	Period during which the appeal under section 112 of the Act before the GSTAT may be filed
1	Such orders of the Appellate authorities or revisional authorities sought to be appealed before the appellate tribunal where the Appeal in Form GST APL-01 or GST APL-03 or notice in Form GST RVN-01 filed or, as the case may be, issued on the common portal on or before 31.01.2022	Period commencing on 24.09.2025 and ending on 31.10.2025 or any date succeeding such date being not later than 30.06.2026
2	Such orders of the Appellate authorities or revisional authorities sought to be appealed before the appellate tribunal where the Appeal in Form GST APL-01 or GST APL-03 or notice in Form GST RVN-01 filed or, as the case may be, issued on the common portal on or after 01.02.2022 but on or before 28.02.2023	Period commencing on 01.11.2025 and ending on 30.11.2025 or any date succeeding such date being not later than 30.06.2026
3	Such orders of the Appellate authorities or revisional authorities sought to be appealed before the appellate tribunal where the Appeal in Form GST APL-01 or GST APL-03 or notice in Form GST RVN-01 filed or, as the case may be issued on the common portal on or after 01.03.2023 but on or before 31.01.2024	Period commencing on 01.12.2025 and ending on 31.12.2025 or any date succeeding such date being not later than 30.06.2026
4	Such orders of the Appellate authorities or revisional authorities sought to be appealed before the appellate tribunal where the Appeal in Form GST APL-01 or GST APL-03 or notice in Form CST RVN-01 filed or, as the case may be, issued on the common portal on or after 01.02.2024 but on or before 31.05.2024	Period commencing on 01.01.2026 and ending on 31.01.2026 or any date succeeding such date being not later than 30.06.2026
5	Such orders of the Appellate authorities or revisional authorities sought to be appealed before the appellate tribunal where the Appeal in Form GST APL-01 or GST APL-03 or notice in Form GST RVN-01 filed or, as the case may be, issued on the common portal on or after 01.06.2024 but on or before 31.03.2026	Period commencing on 01.02.2026 or any date succeeding such date being not later than 30.06.2026

It may be noted that if an appeal before the GSTAT relating to any ARN/CRN could not be filed within the window scheduled for it, the appellant can still come on any subsequent date but before 30^th June, 2026.

It may further be noted that appeals before the GSTAT against any order of the appellate/revisional authority in APL-04 that has been communicated on or after 1^st April, 2026 shall have to filed before the appellate Tribunal within three months of the order of APL-04 being communicated.

Appeals before the GSTAT in cases where the appeal in APL01/03 or notices in RVN-01 are not available in the GSTN system: for all the Appeals filed before the Appellate authority or notices of the Revisional authority where the ARN/CRN is not available in the GSTN system, the filing window will open from the midnight of 31^st December 2025 and will expire on June 30. 2026.

Thus, users are strongly advised not to hurry since more than sufficient time has been provided for filing appeals before the GSTAT wherever the orders in APL-04 have been issued on or before 31^st March 2026.

***”

4.3. It is also brought to the notice that certain modifications are made by Order dated 24.09.2025 of the President, GST Appellate Tribunal and said Order has been revoked with following Order dated 16.12.2025:

“Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Rule 123 of the aforesaid Rules (Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 2025), the undersigned is pleased to revoke the Order dated 24.09.2025 with effect from 18.12.2025. This revocation shall not impugn the validity of any appeals lodged pursuant to the prior order before 18.12.2025. This order is without prejudice to the powers of the Appellate Tribunal under Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.”

4.4. It is no longer res integra that the Writ Court can be approached assailing an order for which the forum of appeal is provided and the same is entertainable in the event the forum is not made functional or constituted as the person cannot be rendered remediless. Equally it is true that if conditions are attached to filing an appeal before such forum, the Writ Court shall ensure strict compliance thereof as a person cannot steal a march taking a shelter that there is no inhibition in the writ Court in entertaining the writ petition and passing an order taking departure from the said statutory provision.

5. Since the forum has already been provided in the statute, which is now made functional and the period for filing the appeal has been extended in a fragmented manner, it would not be proper for the Writ Court to keep such writ petitions pending as the dispute raised by the petitioner in the instant writ petition can be adjudicated by the said forum and, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

The petitioner is directed to deposit the amount if not already deposited, as required under sub-section (8) of Section 112 of the GST Act before the GSTAT to file the appeal within the period specified in the timeline mentioned above.

II.

The petitioner, as undertaken, shall file appeal as per the timeline given in the “User Advisor for the GSTAT e-Filing Portal”.

III.

In the event the appeal is filed and the same is found to be in order as per the requirement of Section 112 of the GST Act read with relevant Rules framed thereunder, the same shall be entertained by the GSTAT.

6. This Court makes it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits on the First Appellate Order. As a result of disposal of the writ petition, pending Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.