A demand order is invalid if a show-cause notice in Form DRC-01 was not issued first.
Issue
Is a summary demand order issued in Form DRC-07 legally valid if the tax department has failed to issue the mandatory, formal show-cause notice (SCN) in Form DRC-01 before passing the final order?
Facts
- The GST department initiated a proceeding by issuing a preliminary intimation of tax liability to the assessee in Form DRC-01A.
- Following this, the department failed to follow the next and most critical step in the adjudication process, which is the issuance of a formal show-cause notice (SCN) in Form DRC-01.
- Instead, the department went straight from the initial intimation (DRC-01A) to issuing a summary of the final order in Form DRC-07. This action created a final demand against the assessee without conducting a proper adjudication proceeding that must be initiated by an SCN.
Decision
The High Court ruled decisively in favour of the assessee.
- It held that the issuance of a show-cause notice in Form DRC-01 is a mandatory and non-negotiable step that must be completed before a final demand can be confirmed and summarized in Form DRC-07.
- A proceeding that bypasses this crucial step is not in accordance with the law.
- The court concluded that the summary order in Form DRC-07, having been issued without the jurisdictional prerequisite of a formal SCN, was legally invalid and was therefore set aside.
Key Takeways
- The Show-Cause Notice is Jurisdictional: The SCN (in Form DRC-01) is the foundational legal document of any demand proceeding. It is what informs the taxpayer of the specific grounds for the proposed demand and gives them the formal opportunity to defend themselves. Without a valid SCN, the entire proceeding is without jurisdiction.
- DRC-01A is Not a Substitute for DRC-01: The intimation in Form DRC-01A is a pre-notice communication, essentially an opportunity for the taxpayer to pay the tax voluntarily to avoid a formal proceeding. It does not and cannot replace the legal requirement of issuing a formal show-cause notice in Form DRC-01 if the taxpayer disputes the liability.
- DRC-07 is Only a Summary: Form DRC-07 is not the detailed adjudication order itself; it is merely a summary of that order which is uploaded to the portal to create the demand in the electronic liability register. It can only be issued after a proper adjudication process has been completed, and that process must be initiated by a valid SCN.
- Procedural Steps in Tax Law are Mandatory: The sequence of notices and procedures laid down in the GST law and the accompanying rules is not optional. A failure to follow these mandatory steps, especially a fundamental one like issuing a show-cause notice, is a fatal flaw that will vitiate the entire proceeding.
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Tvl.P.S.K.Traders
v.
State Tax Officer, Salem
Krishnan Ramasamy, J.
W.P. No. 26605 of 2025
W.M.P. Nos. 29909 & 29911 of 2025
W.M.P. Nos. 29909 & 29911 of 2025
AUGUST 12, 2025
P. Arumugam for the Petitioner. T.N.C. Kaushik, Additional Government Pleader (T) for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. This writ petition has been filed challenging impugned order dated 14.02.2025 passed by the respondent.
2. Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the respondent issued a notice in Form DRC-01A on 05.12.2024 and without issuing notice in Form DRC-01, the respondent straight away issued a summary order in form DRC-07 dated 14.02.2025. Hence, he prayed this Court to grant an opportunity to file a reply by treating the from DRC-01A notice as show cause notice.
4. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent has acceded to the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and requests this Court to pass any appropriate order.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent and also perused the materials available on record.
6. In this case, the respondent has issued a notice in Form DRC-01A on 05.12.2024 and without issuing a notice in Form DRC-01, the respondent issued a summary order in Form DRC-07, which is also evident from perusing the records. Before issuing summary order in Form DRC07, it is mandatory to issue notice in Form DRC-01. If any notice is issued without issuing Form DRC-01, it is not in accordance with law and the same is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, this Court passes the following order:-
(i) | The impugned order dated 14.02.2025, passed by the respondent is set aside. |
(ii) | The petitioner is directed to file a reply by treating the notice in Form DRC-01 as show cause notice, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. |
(iii) | On filing of such reply by the petitioner, the respondent shall consider the same and issue a 14 days clear notice, by fixing the date of personal hearing, to the petitioner and thereafter, pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. |
With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.