Refund of Accumulated Compensation Cess ITC Allowed for Zero-Rated Supplies (Exports with IGST Payment)
Issue
Whether a manufacturer-exporter is entitled to a refund of accumulated Input Tax Credit (ITC) of Compensation Cess paid on inputs (Coal) used for captive power generation to manufacture goods that are exported (Zero-rated supplies) on payment of IGST, even if the final exported product itself is not liable to Compensation Cess.
Facts
Petitioner: A manufacturer-exporter based in Gujarat dealing in zero-rated supplies (exports and SEZ supplies).
Input: The petitioner procured Coal, which attracts Compensation Cess, for captive power generation. They paid the Cess and availed ITC on it.
Output: The final products were exported. The petitioner opted to export “on payment of IGST” (integrated tax).
The Gap: While the inputs (Coal) suffered Cess, the final exported product was not liable to Cess. Consequently, the ITC of the Cess accumulated in the electronic credit ledger.
The Claim: The petitioner sought a refund of this accumulated Cess credit attributable to the zero-rated supplies.
Rejection: The Department rejected the refund claim at both the adjudication and appellate stages. They relied on Circular No. 45/19/2018-GST and Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST, arguing that refund of Cess is restricted or not applicable in this specific scenario (export on payment of IGST where output has no Cess liability).
Decision
The Gujarat High Court ruled in favour of the assessee and quashed the rejection orders.
Misinterpretation of Circulars: The Court held that the Revenue authorities had misinterpreted the CBIC circulars. The circulars were meant to clarify calculations, not to restrict statutory rights granted under the Act.
Legal Entitlement:
A conjoint reading of Section 16(3) of the IGST Act (Zero-rated supplies) and Section 54(3) of the CGST Act establishes the right to refund of unutilised ITC.
Section 11(2) of the GST (Compensation to States) Act allows the utilisation of Cess credit for payment of Cess on output. However, where the output (export) does not attract Cess but is zero-rated, the credit remains unutilised.
Cross-Utilization Bar Doesn’t Apply to Refund: While Cess credit cannot be used to pay IGST/CGST/SGST, there is no bar on claiming a refund of unutilised Cess credit when the goods are exported. The proviso to Section 11(2) restricts utilisation, not refund.
Conclusion: Since the exports were zero-rated, the accumulated Cess credit on inputs (Coal) used for such exports is refundable.
Key Takeaways
Cess Refund is Permissible: Exporters are entitled to a cash refund of accumulated Compensation Cess credit if they cannot use it to pay output liability (because the export product is not subject to Cess or is zero-rated).
Input-Output Link: Even if the final product does not attract Cess, if the input (Coal) did, the exporter should not be burdened with that cost. The principle of zero-rating ensures exports are tax-free, including embedded taxes like Cess.
Circulars Cannot Override Statute: Circulars issued by the Board cannot take away substantive rights (refund) conferred by the Act.
Section 54(3) Scope: The refund mechanism under Section 54(3) covers “any” unutilised input tax credit, which includes Compensation Cess by virtue of the definitions in the Compensation Act.
| Sr. No. | SCA No. | Period for which the refund is claimed | Tax period in FORM GST RFD-01 | Amount of refund (Rs.) | Date of refund application in Form GST RFD-01 | Date of refund rejection order in FORM GST RFD-06 | Date of appeal rejection order in FORM GST APL-04 |
| 1 | 11016 of 2025 | April ’18 to March’19 | Sep-19 | 7,06,30,525 | 28/08/2020 17/09/2020 | 06/11/2020 | 31/01/2022 |
| 2 | 10986 of 2025 | April’20 to August’20 | Aug-20 | 70,29,925 | 22/04/2021 | 17/05/2021 | 19/05/2022 |
| 3 | 10923 of 2025 | Sept’20 | Sep-20 | 7,88,202 | 12/06/2021 | 01/07/2021 | 19/05/2022 |
| 4 | 9876 of 2025 | Oct’20 | Oct-20 | 2,30,206 | 25/12/2021 | 08/02/2022 | 28/02/2023 |
| 5 | 10990 of 2025 | Jan’21 | Jan-21 | 9,12,317 | 30/11/2021 | 28/01/2022 | 28/02/2023 |
| 6 | 9966 of 2025 | Feb’21 | Feb-21 | 35,78,189 | 31/12/2021 | 28/02/2022 | 28/02/2023 |
| 7 | 9880 of 2025 | March’21 | Mar-21 | 21,34,567 | 31/12/2021 | 28/02/2022 | 28/02/2023 |
| 8 | 10911 of 2025 | April’21 to July’21 | Jul-21 | 3,15,327 | 14/02/2023 | 19/04/2023 | 30/10/2023 |
| 9 | 10927 of 2025 | August’21 to Nov’21 | Nov-21 | 5,70,529 | 25/02/2023 | 19/04/2023 | 30/10/2023 |
| 10 | 10983 of 2025 | Dec’21 to Feb’22 | Feb-22 | 17,02,933 | 16/08/2023 | 13/10/2023 | 09/05/2024 |
| 11 | 10905 of 2025 | March’22 to May’22 | May-22 | 1,10,758 | 26/08/2023 | 20/10/2023 | 09/05/2024 |
| 12 | 11001 of 2025 | June’22 to Sept’22 | Sep-22 | 10,93,540 | 01/12/2023 | 29/01/2024 | 17/10/2024 |
“6 The petitioner is a public limited company engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of dyes, dye intermediate, chemicals etc. The petitioner purchased coal for use in its manufacturing process. The petitioner also paid Cess under the Cess Act in addition to the GST for purchase of the coal. It is the case of the petitioner that while coal purchased by the petitioner is liable to Cess, however, the finished goods manufactured by the petitioners are not liable to GST compensation Cess under the Cess Act. Therefore, when the finished goods manufactured by the petitioner are exported outside the country on payment of IGST as permitted by Section 16 of the IGST Act, the petitioner is entitled to the refund of such IGST, however, the petitioner is not required to pay Cess at the time of export of the goods and as the exports being zero rated supply and unutilized input tax credit being fully attributable to exports of the petitioner, the petitioner claimed refund of unutilized input tax credit comprising of the GST compensation Cess which was initially granted to the petitioner by the respondentauthorities
7. However, subsequently, the show cause notices were issued proposing to reject the refund applications on the basis of the Circular No. 125/44/2019 dated 18/11/2019 read with para-5 of Circular No 45/19/2018 dated 30/05/2018 wherein it is stated that the refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit qua Cess will be available only if the export is without payment of tax and as the petitioner has paid IGST on the goods which were exported, the refund of Cess as well as the relatable to the inputs utilized for production of the goods which are exported was held to be inadmissible. The petitioner in the reply clarified that the petitioner has not paid any GST compensation Cess on the goods exported and as such goods being zero rated supply, the petitioner is entitled to the refund of Cess as the provisions of the Cess Act shall apply mutatis mutandis as the same would be applicable in case of the GST. Respondent no 3 also issued notices proposing to withdraw the refund of Cess already granted to the petitioner
8. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has challenged such show cause notice proposing to recover the refund already sanctioned as well as rejecting the refund applications filed by the petitioners for refund of the Cess paid while purchasing the coal which was utilized for manufacture of the goods which are exported by the petitioner.
18. Having heard the learned advocates appearing for both the parties and considering the facts and material available on the record, following undisputed facts emerge.
| (1) | The petitioners have purchased the coal on payment of Cess and as such the petitioner is entitled to the Input Tax Credit on such Cess amount. The petitioner has utilized the coal purchased for manufacture of the goods which are exported. |
| (2) | The petitioner paid the IGST at the time of export of the goods which was refunded by the Custom Authorities as per the provision of Section 54(3) read with Section 16 of the IGST Act being a zero rated supply. |
| (3) | The petitioner therefore filed the refund claim application to claim the Input Tax Credit of the Cess amount which was paid by the petitioner while purchasing the coal and as such coal was utilized for manufacture of exported goods |
19. In view of the above, it would be germane to refer to the relevant provisions of the CGST Act and the IGST Act as well as the Cess Act.
19.1. Section 54(3) of the CGST Act reads as under
“Section 54 – Refund of tax-
(1)…..
(2)…..
(3) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (10), a registered person may claim refund of any unutilised input tax credit at the end of any tax period:
PROVIDED that no refund of unutilised input tax credit shall be allowed in cases other than
| (i) | zero rated supplies made without payment of tax; |
| (ii) | where the credit has accumulated on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on output supplies (other than nil rated or fully exempt supplies), except supplies of goods or services or both as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council: |
PROVIDED also that no refund of input tax credit shall be allowed, if the supplier of goods or services or both avails of drawback in respect of central tax or claims refund of the integrated tax paid on such supplies.”
19.2. Section 16 of the IGST Act reads as under
“Section 16. Zero rated supply.-
(1) “zero rated supply means any of the following supplies of goods or services or both, namely:-
| (a) | export of goods or services or both; or |
| (b) | supply of goods or services or both [for authorised operations) to a Special Economic Zone developer or a Special Economic Zone unit. |
(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (5) of section 17 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, credit of input tax may be availed for making zero-rated supplies, notwithstanding that such supply may be an exempt supply.
[(3) A registered person making zero rated supply shall be eligible to claim refund of unutilised input tax credit on supply of goods or services or both, without payment of integrated tax, under bond or Letter of Undertaking, in accordance with the provisions of section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act or the rules made thereunder, subject to such conditions, safeguards and procedure as may be prescribed
PROVIDED that the registered person making zero rated supply of goods shall, in case of nonrealisation of sale proceeds, be liable to deposit the refund so received under this sub-section along with the applicable interest under section 50 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act within thirty days after the expiry of the time limit prescribed under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999) for receipt of foreign exchange remittances, in such manner as may be prescribed
(4) The Government may, on the recommendation of the Council, and subject to such conditions. safeguards and procedures, by notification, specify
| (i) | a class of persons who may make zero rated supply on payment of integrated tax and claim refund of the tax so paid [in accordance with the provisions of section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act or the rules made thereunder]. |
| (ii) | a class of goods or services (or both, on zero rated supply of which, the supplier may pay integrated tax and claim the refund of tax so paid in accordance with the provisions of section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act or the rules made thereunder]] |
[(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub sections (3) and (4), no refund of unutilised input tax credit on account of zero rated supply of goods or of integrated tax paid on account of zero rated supply of goods shall be allowed where such zero rated supply of goods are subjected to export duty]
19.3. Section 11(2) of the Cess Act reads as under
“Section 11 Other provisions relating to cess
(1)
(2) The provisions of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, and the rules made thereunder. including those relating to assessment, input tax credit, non-levy, short-levy, interest, appeals, offences and penalties, shall, mutatis mutandis, apply in relation to the levy and collection of the cess leviable under section 8 on the inter-State supply of goods and services, as they apply in relation to the levy and collection of integrated tax on such inter-State supplies under the said Act or the rules made thereunder
PROVIDED that the input tax credit in respect of cess on supply of goods and services leviable under section 8, shall be utilised only towards payment of said cess on supply of goods and services leviable under the said section
20. The relevant paragraphs of the circulars relied upon by the respondents also reads as under
20.1. Para-5 of Circular No.45/19/2018 dated 30/05/2018 reads as under
“5. Refund of unutilized input tax credit of compensation cess availed on inputs in cases where the final product is not subject to the levy of compensation cess:
5.1 Doubts have been raised whether an exporter iS eligible to claim refund of unutilized input tax credit of compensation cess paid on inputs, where the final product is not leviable to compensation cess. For instance, cess is levied on coal, which is an input for the manufacture of aluminum products, whereas cess is not levied on aluminum products
5.2 In this regard, section 16(2) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (IGST Act for short) states that, subject to the provisions of section 17(5) of the CGST Act, credit of input tax may be availed for making zero rated supplies Further, as per section 8 of the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017, (hereafter referred to as the Cess Act), all goods and services specified in the Schedule to the Cess Act are leviable to cess under the Cess Act, and vide section 11 (2) of the Cess Act, section 16 of the IGST Act is mutatis mutandis made applicable to inter-State supplies of all such goods and services. Thus, it implies that all supplies of such goods and services are zero rated under the Cess Act. Moreover, as section 17(5) of the CGST Act does not restrict the availment of input tax credit of compensation cess on coal, it is clarified that a registered person making zero rated supply of aluminum products under bond or LUT may claim refund of unutilized credit including that of compensation cess paid on coal.
5.3 Such registered persons may also make zero-rated supply of aluminum products on payment of integrated tax but they cannot utilize the credit of the compensation cess paid on coal for payment of integrated tax in view of the proviso to section 11(2) of the Cess Act, which allows the utilization of the input tax credit of cess, only for the payment of cess on the outward supplies. Accordingly, they cannot claim refund of compensation cess in case of zero-rated supply on payment of integrated tax.
20.2. Para-42 of Circular No.125/44/2019 dated 18/11/2019 reads as under:
“Guidelines for claims of refund of Compensation Cess
42. Doubts have been raised whether a registered person is eligible to claim refund of unutilized input tax credit of compensation cess paid on inputs, where the zero-rated final product is not leviable to compensation cess. For instance, cess is levied on coal, which is an input for the manufacture of aluminium products. whereas cess is not levied on aluminium products. In this context, attention is invited to section 16(2) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter referred to as the “IGST Act”) which states that, subject to the provisions of section 17(5) of the CGST Act, credit of input tax may be availed for making zero rated supplies. Further, section 16 of the IGST Act has been mutatis mutandis made applicable to inter-State supplies under the Cess Act vide section 11 (2) of the Cess Act. Thus, it implies that input tax credit of Compensation Cess may be availed for making zero-rated supplies.
Further, by virtue of section 54(3) of the CGST Act, the refund of such unutilized ITC shall be available. Accordingly, it is clarified that a registered person making zero rated supply of aluminium products under bond or LUT may claim ref refund of unutilized credit including that of compensation cess paid on coal. Such registered persons may also make zero-rated supply of aluminium products on payment of Integrated tax but they cannot utilize the credit of the compensation cess paid on coal for payment of Integrated tax in view of the proviso to section 11(2) of the Cess Act, which allows the utilization of the input tax credit of cess, only for the payment of cess on the outward supplies.”
21. On a conjoint reading of above provisions of the GST Act, IGST ACT and the GST (Compensation to State) Act, 2017 (for short ‘the Cess Act’) as well as para-5 of the Circular No.45/19/2018 and para-42 of Circular No 125/44/2019, the respondent authority appears to have misinterpreted the circulars while rejecting the refund claim applications filed by the petitioner for refund of input tax credit of cess paid by the petitioner for purchase of coal utilized for manufacture of the goods which are exported. As per the provision of Section 54(3) of the GST Act read with Section 16(3) of the IGST Act and Section 11(2) of the Cess Act, the petitioner can claim the refund of unutilized input tax credit for purchase of coal used for manufacture of goods exported being zero rated supply The petitioner has paid IGST on the goods exported by it, however, the petitioner was not required to pay any compensation cess as the goods manufactured by the petitioner are exempted from the levy of compensation cess Therefore, while applying the above provisions, admittedly the compensation cess was not paid at the time of export of goods by the petitioner, the petitioner, therefore, is entitled to refund of input tax credit of the compensation cess paid on purchase of the coal utilized for the purpose of manufacture of the goods which are exported as zero rated supply on payment of IGST by the petitioner. Therefore, reliance placed by the respondent on para-42 of the Circular No. 125/44/2019 dated 18/11/2019 is misplaced because the said circular was issued clarifying the eligibility to claim refund of unutilized input tax credit of compensation cess paid on input, where the zero rated final product is not leviable with compensation cess. However, the circular refers to the provision of Section 16(2) of the IGST Act that the registered person making zero rated supply of aluminum products under bond or may claim refund of unutilized credit including that of compensation cess paid on coal. The circular further clarifies that when the registered person make a zero rated supply of product on payment of integrated tax, they cannot utilize the credit of the compensation cess paid on coal for payment of Integrated tax in view of the proviso to Section 11(2) of the Cess Act, as the said proviso allows the utilization of the input tax credit of cess, only for the payment of cess on the outward supplies. However, when the petitioner has paid the IGST under Section 16(3) of the IGST Act on the zero rated supply and refund is claimed by the payment of such IGST, the petitioner admittedly would not be able to utilize input tax credit of cess as cess is not payable on the zero rated supply Therefore, proviso to Section 11(2) of the Act would not be applicable in the facts of the case and the petitioner would be entitled to refund of the unutilized input tax credit on cess paid on purchase of coal utilized for the purpose of manufacture of goods which are exported.”