Government Contractor Entitled to GST Refund Due to Regime Change; Authorities Directed to Process Claim

By | March 8, 2025

Government Contractor Entitled to GST Refund Due to Regime Change; Authorities Directed to Process Claim

Issue: Whether a government contractor is entitled to a refund of additional GST incurred due to the implementation of the GST regime on a contract awarded prior to its implementation.

Facts:

  • A contract was awarded to the assessee before the implementation of the GST regime.
  • The assessee incurred additional GST liability due to the regime change.
  • Despite repeated requests, the respondent authority failed to process the assessee’s GST refund claim.

Decision:

  • The court directed the respondent authorities to process the assessee’s GST refund claim within 90 days.

Key Takeaways:

  • This case establishes that government contractors are entitled to refunds of additional GST incurred due to a change in the tax regime on pre-existing contracts.
  • The decision emphasizes the responsibility of government authorities to process refund claims promptly and efficiently.
  • It underscores the principle that taxpayers should not bear the financial burden of unexpected tax regime changes on contracts entered into under a different tax structure.
  • This ruling provides relief to government contractors facing similar situations and ensures that they are reimbursed for legitimate GST refund claims.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
B.K. Chawla Contractor
v.
State of Chhattisgarh
Bibhu Datta Guru, J.
WPC No. 676 of 2025
FEBRUARY  3, 2025
K.P.S. Gandhi, Adv. for the Petitioner. Praveen Das, Addl. Adv. General for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. The whole grievance of the petitioner is the inaction on the part of the respondents in not refunding the amount of GST collected from the petitioner in the course of execution of the contract that was awarded to the petitioner.
2. According to the petitioner, the contract was awarded prior to GST regime & GST by the Government from 01.07.2017 during the execution of the works contract.
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of repeated approach being made to the respondents vide Annexure P/6, there is a total inaction on the part of the respondents so far as the refund of GST is concerned. Learned counsel appearing for respondents submits that subject to verification of facts, the claim of the petitioner shall be decided at the earliest.
4. Given the said facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition as of now stands disposed of directing the respondent Authorities to immediately process the claim of the petitioner so far as the refund of GST is concerned, after the due verification of facts and also the entitlement part of the petitioner is concerned. Let an appropriate decision be taken keeping in view the contention of the petitioner that in many of the similar cases of other departments like PWD, PMGSY, NHAI, RAILWAYS, and CPWD the government itself has refunded the GST.
5. Let an appropriate decision be taken within an outer limit of 90 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com