GST Registration Cancellation Quashed; Restoration Ordered Upon Compliance

By | March 9, 2025

GST Registration Cancellation Quashed; Restoration Ordered Upon Compliance

Issue: Whether the cancellation of GST registration is valid when the tax authorities concluded that the taxpayer was not functioning at the declared principal place of business, despite the taxpayer providing evidence to the contrary.

Facts:

  • The tax authorities cancelled the assessee’s GST registration.
  • The cancellation was based on the conclusion that the assessee was not functioning at the declared principal place of business.
  • The assessee produced documents proving their existence and functioning at the registered address.

Decision:

  • The court held that the documentary evidence established that the assessee was indeed functioning at the declared principal place of business.
  • The sole ground for cancellation was contrary to the material on record.
  • The court quashed the impugned cancellation order.
  • The court ordered the restoration of the GST registration subject to the payment of up-to-date taxes and the filing of pending returns.
  • The petition was allowed.

Key Takeaways:

  • This case emphasizes the importance of verifying the actual functioning of a business at its registered address before cancelling GST registration.
  • Documentary evidence provided by the assessee must be given due consideration.
  • Cancellation orders based on conclusions contrary to the material on record are liable to be quashed.
  • Restoration of GST registration can be conditional upon compliance with outstanding tax and return filing obligations.
  • This decision protects businesses from unwarranted cancellations and ensures that cancellations are based on factual evidence.
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Redroom Technology (P.) Ltd.
v.
Union of India
S.R.Krishna Kumar, J.
WRIT PETITION NO. 18868 OF 2024 (T-RES)
AUGUST  14, 2024
Kashish Kumar GuptaSmt. Neha Atul Alur and Aprameya K, Advs. for the Petitioner. Smt. Nayana Tara B.G., CGC and Hema Kumar K., AGA for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
“i)To issue an appropriate writ, order, direction quashing the impugned order dated 31.03.2023 (ANNEXURE-R) canceling the GST registration of the Petitioner as being non-speaking and bad in law; and/or
(ii)To issue an appropriate writ, order, direction quashing the impugned notice dated 17.01.2023 (ANNEXURE-P) for the cancellation of GST Registration of the Petitioner as being vague and in contravention of section 29 of the KGST Act.”
2. Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the material on record.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the Show Cause Notice at Annexure – P dated 17.01.2023, the petitioner has engaged the services of a Consultant/Accountant, who was not in a position to procure necessary documents and submit a reply, as a result of which, the respondent No.3 has proceeded further and passed an impugned order in violation of principles of natural justice and as such, the impugned order passed by the respondent No.3 deserves to be set aside and the cancellation of the GST registration of the petitioner deserves to be restored.
4. Per contra, the learned Additional Government Advocate would support the impugned order and submits that there is no merit in the petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.
5. A perusal of the impugned Show Cause Notice at Annexure – P dated 17.01.2023 and the impugned order at Annexure – R dated 31.03.2023 will indicate that the sole ground on which the GST registration of the petitioner has been cancelled by the respondent No.3 is by coming to the conclusion that the petitioner/tax payer was not functioning and existing at the principal place of business. However, the cumulative effect of the various documents produced by the petitioner in the present petition is sufficient to come to the conclusion that the petitioner/tax payer is actually functioning and existing at the principal place of business at Bengaluru and consequently, the sole reason assigned by the respondent No.3 in canceling the GST registration is contrary to the material on record warranting interference by this Court in the present petition.
6. In the result, the following:
ORDER
A.The petition is allowed.
B.The impugned order at Annexure – R dated 31.03.2023 is hereby quashed.
C.The respondent No.3 – the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bengaluru is directed to restore/reinstate the GST registration of the petitioner immediately upon the petitioner paying up to date taxes and filing the returns in accordance with law.
D.The respondent No.3 is directed to permit the petitioner to submit/file its returns to enable compliance of this order.
Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com