Demand Order Quashed; Matter Remanded for Consideration of Assessee’s Reply

By | March 10, 2025

 Demand Order Quashed; Matter Remanded for Consideration of Assessee’s Reply

Issue: Whether a demand order is valid when the assessing authority fails to consider the assessee’s reply to the show cause notice.

Facts:

  • The assessee, engaged in event management services, received a notice in DRC-01 with a personal hearing due to discrepancies found during scrutiny of returns.
  • The assessee submitted a reply to the show cause notice, which was duly acknowledged.
  • However, the impugned order was passed on the basis that the assessee had not submitted any reply.

Decision:

  • The court held that since the impugned order was passed overlooking the fact that the assessee had filed a reply to the show cause notice, the respondent authority was directed to consider the assessee’s reply.
  • The court directed the respondent authority to pass orders afresh after affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing.

Key Takeaways:

  • Importance of Considering Reply: Assessing authorities are obligated to consider the assessee’s reply to a show cause notice.
  • Violation of Natural Justice: Failure to consider the assessee’s reply constitutes a violation of the principles of natural justice.
  • Remand for Fresh Consideration: When an order is passed without considering the assessee’s reply, the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration.
  • Opportunity of Hearing: The assessee must be given a reasonable opportunity of hearing to present their case.
  • This decision reinforces the importance of procedural fairness and ensures that assessees are not penalized for errors made by the assessing authorities.
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Karthik Kumar Yogapriya
v.
State Tax Officer (FAC)
Mohammed Shaffiq, J.
W.P. No.38946 of 2024
W.M.P.Nos.42186 and 42187 of 2024
DECEMBER  19, 2024
N.V. Narayanan for the Petitioner. Ms. Amrita Dinakaran, Govt. Adv. for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 19.08.2024 on the limited ground that the impugned order proceeds on the basis that no reply was filed overlooking the fact that the petitioner had in fact filed its reply to the show cause notice vide letter dated 17.08.2024.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is engaged in the business of providing event management services to varied client across India and is registered under the GST Act. During the relevant period of 2018-19, the petitioner has filed the returns and paid appropriate taxes. However, on scrutiny of the returns, the following defects were noticed:
(i)Tax on outward supplies under declared on reconciliation of data in GSTR 09.
(ii)Reconciliation of GSTR 01 and GSTR 09.
(iii)Excess ITC claimd on account of non-reconciliation of information.
(iv)ITC to be reversed on non-business transactions and exempt supplies.
(v)Under declaration of Ineligible ITC.
(vi)ITC claimed from cancelled dealers, return defaulters and tax non payers.
(vii)Interest due to late payment of GSTR 3B.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner a notice in DRC01 was issued on 20.05.2024 with personal hearing on 30.05.2024. Thereafter, two reminders viz., 27.06.2024 and 13.07.2024 was also issued to the petitioner. In response to the show cause notice dated 20.05.2024 the petitioner submitted its reply dated 17.08.2024, which was duly acknowledged. However, the impugned order proceeds on the basis that the petitioner has not submitted any reply.
4. On this being pointed out, the learned counsel for the respondent on instructions would submit that they would pass orders afresh after considering the petitioner’s reply dated 17.08.2024 and after affording the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
5. In view thereof, the impugned order is set aside. The respondent is directed to consider the petitioner’s reply dated 17.08.202 and pass orders afresh after affording the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com