State GST SCN Stayed Pending DGGI Proceedings; No Coercive Action

By | March 12, 2025

State GST SCN Stayed Pending DGGI Proceedings; No Coercive Action

Parallel proceedings under CGST and SGST can be stayed if the same period is under investigation by DGGI.

Issue: Whether a show cause notice (SCN) issued by the State GST authority under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, should be stayed when the same tax period is already under investigation and adjudication by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Chandigarh.

Facts:

  • The assessee challenged an SCN issued by the State GST authority under Section 73.
  • The assessee contended that the same tax period was already the subject matter of investigation and adjudication pursuant to an SCN issued by DGGI, Chandigarh.
  • The revenue submitted that no further steps would be taken on the impugned SCN pending the outcome of the DGGI proceedings.

Decision:

  • The court disposed of the petition, recording the revenue’s statement that no coercive steps would be taken on the impugned SCN until the conclusion of the DGGI proceedings.

Key Takeaways:

  • Overlapping Jurisdiction: When multiple authorities initiate proceedings for the same tax period, it can lead to overlapping jurisdiction and conflicting decisions.
  • DGGI Proceedings Prevail: In this case, the revenue agreed to stay the State GST proceedings pending the outcome of the DGGI proceedings, acknowledging the DGGI’s broader investigative powers.
  • No Coercive Action: The court’s order ensures that the assessee is protected from coercive action by the State GST authority until the DGGI proceedings are concluded.
  • Prevention of Duplication: This decision prevents duplication of proceedings and ensures that the assessee is not subjected to multiple investigations for the same issue.
  • Clarity and Certainty: The court’s order provides clarity and certainty to the assessee, preventing unnecessary harassment and litigation.
  • The court is ensuring that the tax payer is not subjected to multiple investigations for the same issue, and is allowing the DGGI investigation to conclude first.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
DRJ Petrochem (P.) Ltd.
v.
Sales Tax Officer
Yashwant Varma and Ravinder Dudeja, JJ.
W.P.(C) 8925 of 2024
CM APPL. 36410 of 2024
OCTOBER  25, 2024
Priyadarshi ManishMs. Anjali Jha Manish and Ms. Muskan Saxena, Advs. for the Petitioner. Avishkar Singhvi, ASC and Shubham Kumar, Adv. for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. The writ petitioner has challenged the issuance of the Show Cause Notice [“SCN”] under Section 73 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 by the State Goods & Services Tax authority.
2. The principal ground on which the initiation of proceedings is assailed is in view of the same tax period presently forming subject matter of investigation and adjudication in terms of a SCN which has been issued by the Directorate General of GST Investigation [“DGGI”], Chandigarh.
3. In light of the decision handed down by the Court in DLF Home Developers Limited v. Sales Tax Officer Class II, AVATO, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. [WP(C) 11037/2024 dated 26 September 2024], Mr. Singhvi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that awaiting and subject to the outcome of the proceedings as drawn by the DGGI, no further steps are proposed to be taken by the respondent pursuant to the SCN which stands impugned in the writ petition. The statement so made is recorded and accepted.
4. The writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com