IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 23.05.2025
| Section | Case Law Title | Brief Summary | Citation | Relevant Act |
| 2(15) | Ramswaroop Das Niranjanlal Charitable Trust v. Deputy Commissioner of Income- tax | Exemption under section 11 not denied to trust renting out ‘Dharamshala’ for various functions, as predominant object was charitable. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 4 | Maheshchandra Natvarlal Parikh v. Commissioner of Income-tax (IT and TP) | No addition for cash deposits in NRO account; NRI assessee provided all material facts and documents. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 9 | Sujan Luxury Hospitality (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax | Payments for spa consultancy and management services to Sri Lanka resident not taxable in India under India-Sri Lanka DTAA (Article 14 – Independent Personal Services). | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 9 | Sujan Luxury Hospitality (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax | Disallowance of amount paid to Kenyan company for marketing research outside India deleted as services rendered outside India and no FTS provision in India-Kenya DTAA. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 10(23C) | Institute Management Committee of Government ITI Peth v. ITO, Ward-1(1) | Educational Institution’s Exemption u/s 10(23C) Allowed on Interest from Govt Grant Used for Institute’s Purpose. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 10(23C), 139(4C) | Harda Nagar Bal Vikas Samiti Harda v. Income Tax Officer | Educational Institution’s Exemption u/s 10(23C) Allowed for AY 2017-18 Despite Non-Filing of Return, as Proviso Not Retrospective. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 11, 12A | Bright Land College v. Income-tax Officer (Exemption) | Charitable Trust’s Exemption Allowed Despite ITR Filing Error, Given Proper Application of Funds and 12A Registration. | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
| 12A | Khodiyar Gau Seva Yuvak Mandal Charitable Trust v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) | Charitable Trust (Cow Care) Registration Application Remanded for Fresh Adjudication Due to Summary Rejection and Portal Issues. | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
| 14A | Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. N.K. Industries Ltd. | No disallowance under section 14A in absence of any exempt income earned/claimed. | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
| 37(1) | Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. N.K. Industries Ltd. | Deduction for debit notes for poor quality FSG oil allowed; MoU acted upon. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 37(1) | Roopa Rana Infrastructures (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT | Disallowance under section 37(1) not made solely on ground of payees not registered under GST if payments through banking channels, TDS deducted, and genuineness not doubted. | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
| 37(1) | Motorola Solutions India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT | Liquidated damages allowed as business expenditure; contract contemplated liability on delay. | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
| 37(1) | Motorola Solutions India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT | Software annual maintenance charges allowed as revenue expenditure. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 37(1) | Anand Diagnostic Laboratory v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax | Discount on prompt payment of bill allowed as business expenditure. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 37(1) | Deputy Commissioner of Income -tax v. Religare Comtrade Ltd. | Storage charges for gold in vault due to delay in identifying buyers allowed as compensatory expenditure. | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
| 43(5) | Deputy Commissioner of Income -tax v. Religare Comtrade Ltd. | Loss from derivative trading in gold to safeguard against business losses not treated as speculative. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 43(5) | Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. N.K. Industries Ltd. | Loss incurred on NSEL transactions to avail finance for business not speculative. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 43B(f) | Motorola Solutions India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT | Provision for leave salary not paid on or before due date disallowed under section 43B(f). | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 45(4) | Anand Diagnostic Laboratory v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax | Addition under section 45(4) deleted; no transfer of asset to partner’s account from firm on capital contribution. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 50C, 50C(2)(a) | Pradeep Wig v. ACIT | AO obligated to refer to DVO when assessee objects to stamp duty rate as deemed sale consideration. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 51 | Pradeep Wig v. ACIT | No addition for advance money received if property sold and capital gains offered in subsequent assessment year. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 139 | Pradeep Wig v. ACIT | Assessee not beneficial owner of shares through LRS; income from assets of company not assessable in assessee’s hands. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 143(2), General Clauses Act, 10 | Ramswaroop Das Niranjanlal Charitable Trust v. Deputy Commissioner of Income- tax | Service of notice under section 143(2) on 1-10-2012 valid if 30-9-2012 was a Sunday, due to Section 10 of General Clauses Act. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961; General Clauses Act |
| 144B | Maa Padmavati Exports v. Assessment Unit, Income-tax Department | Assessment order quashed; passed without providing cross-examination opportunity. | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
| 153A | Pradeep Wig v. ACIT | No addition can be made on estimated basis in 153A proceedings, especially when 80% is allowable. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 189, 148 | Kanak Kumar Jain v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax | Reassessment Notice to Dissolved Firm with Deceased Partners: Invalid Without Proper Legal Heir Notice and Order | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
| 245D, 245C | Mehta Stone Polishers v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax | Matter remitted to Settlement Commission; application dismissed for failure to reconstruct records without involving assessee. | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
| 260A | C.I. Builders (P.) Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax | Condonation of Delay of 7 years in filing Appeal : Assessee’s Lack of Diligence Justifies Refusal despite counsel’s negligence. | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
| 269UN, 269UG, 293 | Sasmita Investments Ltd. v. Appropriate Authority | Suit seeking declaration of abrogated compulsory purchase order due to non-compliance of section 269-UG is maintainable and not barred. | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
Related Post
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 22.05.2025
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 21.05.2025
Improtant Income Tax Case Law 20.05.2025
34 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAW 19.05.2025
14 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 05.03.2025
29 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 04.03.2025
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 03.03.2025
Income Tax Case Laws in February 2025
Income Tax Case Laws in January 2025