Tax effect for revenue appeals, when income is enhanced from a returned loss, is calculated on the returned loss plus assessed income, excluding uncarried forward earlier year losses.
Issue:
How to determine the “tax effect” for the purpose of the monetary limit for filing appeals by the revenue under Section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, especially when the Assessing Officer (AO) has enhanced the assessee’s income from a returned loss, and whether the tax effect of earlier years’ losses that were not permitted to be carried forward should be included in this calculation.
Facts:
- The case pertains to Assessment Year 2018-19.
- The issue involves the interpretation of CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2024 dated March 15, 2024, and Circular No. 9 of 2024 dated September 17, 2024, regarding monetary limits for filing appeals.
- The specific scenario is where the Assessing Officer had enhanced the income of the assessee to reflect an assessed income, implying the assessee might have originally filed a return showing a loss.
Decision:
The court held in favor of the assessee. It ruled that:
- In terms of CBDT Circular No. 5/2024 and Circular No. 9/2024, where the Assessing Officer had enhanced the income of the assessee to reflect assessed income, the tax effect would be determined on the amount of returned loss plus the assessed income.
- Therefore, the tax effect of losses of earlier years which were not permitted to be carried forward was not to be taken into account to determine the overall tax effect for the purpose of filing an appeal by the revenue.
Key Takeaways:
- Purpose of Section 268A and CBDT Circulars: Section 268A empowers the CBDT to issue instructions to restrict the filing of appeals by income-tax authorities based on monetary limits. The circulars (No. 5/2024 and No. 9/2024 in this context) lay down these specific monetary thresholds. The objective is to reduce frivolous litigation for small amounts and allow the department to focus on cases with higher tax implications.
- Calculation of “Tax Effect” for Enhanced Income from Loss: When an assessee declares a loss, but the AO makes additions that convert the loss into positive income, the “tax effect” for appeal purposes is calculated by adding the amount of the returned loss to the assessed income. This effectively represents the total positive adjustment made by the AO.
- Example: If returned loss is Rs. 10 lakhs and assessed income is Rs. 5 lakhs, the “tax effect” relevant amount would be Rs. 10 lakhs (loss) + Rs. 5 lakhs (assessed income) = Rs. 15 lakhs. The tax on this Rs. 15 lakhs would then be compared with the monetary limit.
- Exclusion of Unpermitted Carried Forward Losses: The ruling specifically clarifies that losses of earlier years which were not permitted to be carried forward (i.e., not allowed as a deduction in the current year’s assessment) are not to be included in determining the current year’s “tax effect” for appeal purposes. This is because these unabsorbed losses do not represent a “tax effect” pertaining to the current year’s dispute or assessment outcome. They are separate issues.
- Focus on Disputed Amount’s Impact: The intent of the circulars is to measure the tax at stake directly from the additions or disallowances made in the assessment year under consideration. Unabsorbed losses from previous years, even if disallowed, are conceptually distinct from the current year’s assessed income enhancement.
- Facilitating Appeal Management: This clarification helps in streamlining the process for tax authorities by providing a clear methodology for calculating the “tax effect” in complex scenarios involving losses, ensuring that appeals are filed only in genuinely high-stake cases as per policy.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Commissioner of Income-tax, International Taxation
v.
SIS Live
Vibhu Bakhru and Tejas Karia, JJ.
IT Appeal No.173 of 2024
MAY 7, 2025
Anant Mann, JSC for the Appellant. P. Roy Chaudhuri, Rishi Bhatnagar and Rishabh Gaur, Advs. for the Respondent.
ORDER
CM APPL. 8660/2025
Vibhu Bakhru, J.- The respondent has filed the present application, inter alia, praying as under:
“Allow the present application and dismiss the present appeal, being ITA No. 173/2024 on the ground of low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No. 09/2024 dated 17.09.2024 read with CBDT Circular No. 05/2024 dated 15.03.2024.”
2. The Assessee has also placed on record the computation of tax effect in the present case, which indicates that it is below the threshold limit of ?2 crores as stipulated in Circular No.5 of 2024 dated 15.03.2024 as modified by the Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes [CBDT]. In terms of the said circular, the threshold tax limit for appealing before this court was stipulated at ?2 crores. The Assessee has set out a tabular statement computing the tax effect in the present case as Rs.1,13,33,599/-. Paragraph 5 of the present application that includes the said tabular statement is set out below:
“5. That in the present case, the loss of Rs.28050853.00 has been converted into profit/income of Rs.10011906.00. Therefore, the notional addition comes to Rs.38062759.00 (28050853.00 + 10011906.00). The tax effect on Rs.38062759.00 for the relevant Assessment Year is Rs.11333599.00 the calculation of which is shown below:
Particulars | Amount (INR) |
Tax@ 30% on Rs. 28199882.00 (Rs. 38062759.00 – Rs.9862877.00)* *This amount of Rs.9862877.00 to be taxed @15% as per Assessment Order | 8459965.00 |
Tax@ 15% on interest income of Rs. 9862877.00 | 1479432.00 |
Total notional tax | 9939397.00 |
Add Surcharge @ 12% | 1015196.00 |
Add cess @ 4% on tax and surcharge | 379006.00 |
Total tax effect in terms ofCBDT Circular | 11333599.00 |
3. There is no cavil with the calculation as set out by the Assessee. However, according to the Revenue the tax effect in the present case would be higher as the AO has also observed that the losses of earlier years cannot be permitted to be brought forward. Thus, the Revenue contends that the tax on the losses which were assessed in the assessment years prior to Assessment Year [AY] 2018-19 must also be taken into account to determine the overall tax effect.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the Revenue has referred paragraph 5.1 of the Circular which provides for the manner in computing the tax effect ascertaining whether the same exceeds the threshold as specified in the said circular. We consider it apposite to set out the said paragraph 5.1of the CBDT’s Circular:
“5.1 For this purpose, ‘tax effect’ means the difference between the tax on the total income assessed and the tax that would have been chargeable had such total income been reduced by the amount of income in respect of the issues against which appeal is intended to be filed (hereinafter referred to as ‘disputed issues’). Further, ‘tax effect’ shall be tax including applicable surcharge and cess. However, the tax will not include any interest thereon, except where chargeability of interest itself is in dispute. In case the chargeability of interest is the issue under dispute, the amount of interest shall be the tax effect. In cases where returned loss is reduced or assessed as income, the tax effect would include notional tax on disputed additions. In case of penalty orders, the tax effect will mean quantum of penalty deleted or reduced in the order to be appealed against.”
[emphasis added]
5. It would be necessary to refer to the assessment order for determining the tax effect in accordance with paragraph 5.1 of the said Circular as mentioned above. Paragraph 23 of the assessment order assesses the total income of the Assessee at Rs.91,06,616/-. Paragraph 23 of the assessment order is set out below:
“23. Pursuant to directions of Hon’ble DRP-2, New Delhi, the income of the assessee is re-computed as below;
Particulars | Amount (in Rs.) |
Income from business & profession as reported in ITR | (4,54,08,852/-) |
Disallowance of expenses | 4,53,42,685/- |
Net business income | (66,167/-) |
Interest from refund | 2,62,230/- |
Interest income as discussed above to be taxed @15% | 89,10,553/- |
Total income | 91,06,616/- |
6. In the present case, the Assessee had filed an income returning a loss, however, the AO had enhanced the income of the Assessee to reflect the assessed income at Rs.1,00,11,906/-. Thus, the first step for calculating the tax effect would be to determine the quantum by which the returned loss is reduced. In the present case, the entire returned loss of Rs.4,54,08,852/- has been wiped out by the additions made by the AO and further the AO has assessed the income at Rs.91,06,616/-. Thus, the total tax effect is to be determined on an amount of Rs.5,45,15,468/- [Rs.4,54,08,852/- + Rs.91,06,616/-]. Concededly, the tax effect on the said amount is less than the stipulated limit of Rs.2 crores.
7. The contention that the losses assessed in the previous assessment years must also be taken into account as the carry forward of the same has been disallowed is unmerited. We do not find the machinery to compute the tax effect as posited in paragraph 5.1 of the aforementioned Circular contemplates taking into account the observations made by the AO in regard to the losses assessed in the previous years which have been carried forward. Thus, although the AO in the present case has noted that the business losses of prior years amounting to Rs.56,40,20,407 are also required to be disallowed. The same does not require to be included for the purposes of computing the tax effect under paragraph 5.1 of the aforementioned CBDT Circular.
8. In the aforesaid event, the Revenue is required to accept the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which is the subject matter of appeal in the present petition as final.
9. There is also no cavil that losses for prior assessment years cannot be disallowed without reopening of the assessments for prior years, which in this case have attained finality.
10. The application is accordingly allowed.
ITA 173/2024 and CM APPL. 15027/2024
11. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed. Pending application is also disposed of.