IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 29.05.2025
Here’s the requested case law analysis in a table format:
Section | Case Law Title | Brief Summary | Citation | Relevant Act |
12A(1)(ac)(vi)(B), 12A(1)(ac)(iii) | Zarina Foundation v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) | Cancellation of registration set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication as no show-cause notice was issued highlighting discrepancy in application clause. | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
12AB(4)(e) | Mukund Bhavan Trust v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) | Cancellation of registration not justified when trust was created prior to 1961 Act and no change in objects/activities since registration. | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
12AB(1)(ac)(i), 12AB(4)(f) | Mukund Bhavan Trust v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) | Cancellation of registration not justified for non-registration with charity commissioner under BPT Act if no order/decree of non-compliance. | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
13(1)(c), 11 | Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) v. Pardada Pardadi Educational Society | Exemption under section 11 not denied for remuneration paid to CEO of trust; salary was reasonable and no material to prove it was excessive. | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
37(1), 36(1)(vii) | Adarsh Developers v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax | Write-off of advances to wholly owned subsidiary due to continued losses and erosion of net worth allowed as business loss (section 37(1)) or bad debt (section 36(1)(vii)). | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
80G(5) | Gandhinagar Ayyapa Pooja Samiti v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) | Rejection of final approval under section 80G(5) set aside; provisional approval granted, Commissioner should have considered application under correct provisions. | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
143(1)(a) | Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Mahesh Mohanbhai Patel (HUF) | CPC’s Section 143(1) adjustment for contingent liability is erroneous if not debited to P&L | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
237 | Karnataka Golf Association v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) | Assessee entitled to refund of entire amount in excess of 20% of demand, along with interest, when demand was recovered by adjusting refund amounts. | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
Related Post
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 28.05.2025
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 26.05.2025
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 23.05.2025
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 22.05.2025
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 21.05.2025
Improtant Income Tax Case Law 20.05.2025
34 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAW 19.05.2025
14 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 05.03.2025
29 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 04.03.2025
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 03.03.2025
Income Tax Case Laws in February 2025
Income Tax Case Laws in January 2025