IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 29.05.2025

By | June 1, 2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 29.05.2025

Here’s the requested case law analysis in a table format:

SectionCase Law TitleBrief SummaryCitationRelevant Act
12A(1)(ac)(vi)(B), 12A(1)(ac)(iii)Zarina Foundation v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption)Cancellation of registration set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication as no show-cause notice was issued highlighting discrepancy in application clause.

Click Here

Income-tax Act, 1961
12AB(4)(e)Mukund Bhavan Trust v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption)Cancellation of registration not justified when trust was created prior to 1961 Act and no change in objects/activities since registration.

Click Here

Income-tax Act, 1961
12AB(1)(ac)(i), 12AB(4)(f)Mukund Bhavan Trust v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption)Cancellation of registration not justified for non-registration with charity commissioner under BPT Act if no order/decree of non-compliance.

Click Here

Income-tax Act, 1961
13(1)(c), 11Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) v. Pardada Pardadi Educational SocietyExemption under section 11 not denied for remuneration paid to CEO of trust; salary was reasonable and no material to prove it was excessive.

Click Here

Income-tax Act, 1961
37(1), 36(1)(vii)Adarsh Developers v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-taxWrite-off of advances to wholly owned subsidiary due to continued losses and erosion of net worth allowed as business loss (section 37(1)) or bad debt (section 36(1)(vii)).Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
80G(5)Gandhinagar Ayyapa Pooja Samiti v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption)Rejection of final approval under section 80G(5) set aside; provisional approval granted, Commissioner should have considered application under correct provisions.

Click Here

Income-tax Act, 1961
143(1)(a)Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Mahesh Mohanbhai Patel (HUF)CPC’s Section 143(1) adjustment for contingent liability is erroneous if not debited to P&L

Click Here

Income-tax Act, 1961
237Karnataka Golf Association v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption)Assessee entitled to refund of entire amount in excess of 20% of demand, along with interest, when demand was recovered by adjusting refund amounts.

Click Here

Income-tax Act, 1961

Related Post

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 28.05.2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 26.05.2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 23.05.2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 22.05.2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 21.05.2025

Improtant Income Tax Case Law 20.05.2025

34 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAW 19.05.2025

14 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 05.03.2025

29 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 04.03.2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 03.03.2025

Income Tax Case Laws in February 2025

Income Tax Case Laws in January 2025