IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 29.05.2025
| Section | Case Law Title | Brief Summary | Citation | Relevant Act |
| 9 (CGST Act) | Marudhar Food Products v. Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Division | SLP admitted against High Court judgment; issue of tax leviability prior to 27-7-2023 based on circulars not raised before adjudicating authority. | Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 | |
| 29 (CGST Act) | Naseer Ahmad Sheikh v. Union Territory of J & K | Suspended GST registration can be restored within seven days subject to formalities and undertaking to file returns and pay taxes. | Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 | |
| 29 (CGST Act) | Sparkle Gold v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax | Retrospective cancellation of registration unjustified when petitioner sought cancellation; registration to be cancelled from date prayed. | Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 | |
| 73 (CGST Act) | Prince Diamond Jewellers (P.) Ltd. v. Goods and Service Tax Officer | Assessee permitted to file appeal under section 107 for time-barred appeal against ex-parte order creating substantial demand, given no prior knowledge of SCN. | Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 | |
| 73 (CGST Act) | Power Engineering (India) (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India | Matter re-adjudicated; authorities drew conclusion of wrongly availed refund without adhering to prescribed procedure (no notice under section 73). | Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 | |
| 74 (CGST Act), 107 (CGST Act) | Techno Canada Inc v. Union of India | Assessee relegated to appellate remedy under section 107 for demand due to excess ITC availment, as issues involve factual analysis of fraud/wilful misstatement. | Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 | |
| 75 (CGST Act) | Saini Zarda Store v. State of U.P. | Impugned order set aside as it was ex parte; no knowledge or physical service of show cause notice. | Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 | |
| 83 (CGST Act) | Shubh Corporation v. State of Maharashtra | Provisional attachment order set aside as no determination of tax amount, no show-cause proceedings, and no material indicating necessity to secure revenue’s interest. | Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 | |
| 83 (CGST Act) | Kishor Kumar Reddy v. Deputy Assistant Commissioner of State Tax | Assessment order and attachment notice set aside; lacked assessing officer’s signature and DIN number, rendering it invalid. | Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 | |
| 93 (CGST Act), 74 (UPGST Act) | Satendra Kumar v. State of U.P. | Show cause notice and order set aside; issued in the name of a deceased person and not known to legal heirs. | Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017; Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act | |
| 112 (CGST Act) | Vasantgiri Devgiri Goswami v. Additional Commissioner | Leave granted to withdraw writ petition to avail statutory remedy of appeal before GST Appellate Tribunal. | Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 | |
| 140 (CGST Act), 13 (UPVAT Act) | Commissioner Commercial Tax v. S/S Ravi Prakash Rahul Prakash | Dealer not entitled to transitional ITC on closing stock at GST introduction if goods not yet sold as taxable sale under UPVAT Act. | Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017; Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act | |
| 160 (CGST Act) | Mekala Sudhakar v. Deputy Assistant Commissionerstate Tax | Assessment orders set aside; lacked DIN number and signature of assessing officer, rendering them invalid. | Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 |
Related Post
IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 28.05.2025
IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 23.05.2025
IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 22.05.2025
IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 21.05.2025
IMPORTANT GST CASE LAW 19.05.2025
IMPORTANT GST CASE LAW 19.05.2025
13 IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 05.03.2025
IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 04.03.2025