IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 31.05.2025

By | June 3, 2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 31.05.2025

Section/NotificationCase Law TitleBrief SummaryCitationRelevant Act
NOTIFICATION NO. 51/2025 AND NOTIFICATION NO. 50/2025, DATED 29-05-2025N/ACBDT issued corrigendum to substitute Schedule 80-IE in ITR-3 and ITR-5 for AY 2025-26.NOTIFICATION NO. 51/2025 AND NOTIFICATION NO. 50/2025, DATED 29-05-2025Income-tax Act, 1961
2(22)(e)Krishan Kant Kohli v. DCIT Central CircleLoan or advance from a partnership firm (not a closely held company) cannot be treated as deemed dividend.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
4PR. Commissioner of Income-tax I v. M. P. Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Ltd.One-time charges recovered by electricity distribution company for laying power lines and acquiring infrastructure are capital receipts.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
11Guru Singh Sabha v. Income-tax Officer (Exemption)Filing Form 10B tax audit report for section 11 benefit is directory, not mandatory; can be uploaded during appellate proceedings.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
12A, 80GSai Seva Sansthan v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption)Ex-parte orders rejecting 12A and 80G registration are set aside and remanded for fresh consideration to non-receipt of hearing notices.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
12ABSetu Sansthan v. CIT (Exemption) JaipurMatter restored to Commissioner (Exemptions) for reconsideration of registration, as assessee was in process of applying under Rajasthan Public Trust Act.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
31, 37(1)Shanti Bhushan v. Commissioner of Income Tax DelhiAppeal disposed of as infructuous; expenses for coronary surgery of a lawyer not allowable under section 31 (not ‘plant’) or section 37(1) (no direct nexus with professional efficiency). 

Click Here

Income-tax Act, 1961
54FIncome-tax Officer v. Narasimha Reddy Duthala

Section 54F exemption allowed as assessee met substantive conditions, with house transfers to daughter and under-construction house not counting as “more than one house,” and deposit made within extended due date.

Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
54FMrs. Ratan Mahendra Jain v. Income-tax OfficerExemption under section 54F allowed for purchase of a duplex home by a single deed of transfer, as it is not considered two residential houses.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
68Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Event Developers (P.) Ltd.Reopening notice justified as assessee failed to establish genuineness and creditworthiness of company providing bogus LTCG/STCG, found to be a shell company.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
68, 153CPanch Tatva Promotors (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-taxReopening assessment under Section 153C is invalid if the incriminating material from a search pertains to an earlier financial year and not the relevant assessment year.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
70Teacher Retirement System of Texas v. ACIT (IT) – 4(1)(2)Short-term capital loss (STT paid) can be set off against short-term capital gains (STT not paid).Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
80GGems Chamber of Commerce Association v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption)Matter remanded for one more opportunity to assessee to substantiate its case for 80G approval, as permanent registration under section 12AB(1)(b) was already granted.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
80GSenior Citizen Council Gandhinagar v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption)Matter remitted to Commissioner (Exemption) to consider 80G application under correct sub-clause (ii) instead of inadvertently selected (iv) of proviso to section 80G(5).Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
80GAatman Foundation v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption)Matter remanded for de novo consideration; inadvertent error in filing Form 10AB (incorrect sub-clause for 80G approval).Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
220, IBC, 2016V S Texmills (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-taxIncome Tax Department demand not claimed in approved resolution plan under IBC stands extinguished.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961; Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
245Mediakind India (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax, CPCRevenue authorities directed to refund entire amount in excess of 20% of demand when 20% already deposited and stay application filed.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
249, CBDT Circular No. 20/2016Shrikunj Corporation v. Commissioner of Income-taxDismissal of appeal for delay unsustainable when manual appeal filed within statutory period and e-filed within extended time.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961

Related Post

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAW 30.05.25

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 29.05.2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 28.05.2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 26.05.2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 23.05.2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 22.05.2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 21.05.2025

Improtant Income Tax Case Law 20.05.2025

34 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAW 19.05.2025

14 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 05.03.2025

29 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 04.03.2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 03.03.2025

Income Tax Case Laws in February 2025

Income Tax Case Laws in January 2025