IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 18.09.2025

By | September 20, 2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 18.09.2025

Section Case Law Title Brief Summary Citation Relevant Act
12AB Hatkeshwar Mahadev Trust v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) Denial of registration to charitable trust unjustified; objects catering to a religious caste are permissible if income isn’t applied for that specific benefit and no violation inquiry was made. Click Here Income-tax Act, 1961
50C Pavanchandra Chit Funds (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Upholding AO’s adoption of SRO value for capital gains; remanded for re-adjudication of deductions for Building UDA development and conversion charges. Click Here Income-tax Act, 1961
54B, 263 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Kanubhai Vanmalibhai Patel HUF SLP dismissed; AO’s detailed inquiry and allowance of deduction under section 54B was a legally sustainable view, so PC’s order under section 263 was not upheld. Click Here Income-tax Act, 1961
64 Sushama Rajesh Rao v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Capital gain from sale of agricultural land gifted to assessee by husband is taxable in the hands of the husband. Click Here Income-tax Act, 1961
68, 151(2) Sunidhi Securities & Finance Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Reopening notice for AY 2015-16 invalid; sanction for reassessment notice obtained from Principal Commissioner instead of Joint Commissioner. Click Here Income-tax Act, 1961
68, 148A(d), 148 Balkrishna Mangaldas Thakkar v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Reopening order and notice not sustainable; assessee’s temporary loan transaction was genuine and through banking channels. Click Here Income-tax Act, 1961
69 Pavanchandra Chit Funds (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Matter remanded to AO for verification of re-transfer of land as no cash payment was made; re-transfer should not be treated as unexplained investment. Click Here Income-tax Act, 1961
69B, 153C Jaihan Infrastructure v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Assessee should be given an opportunity of being heard before reassessment is concluded based on search material. Click Here Income-tax Act, 1961
69C Income-tax Officer v. Vohra Solvex (P.) Ltd. Purchases cannot be treated as bogus when documentary evidence is provided and books are not rejected; only profit element can be added. Click Here Income-tax Act, 1961
69C, 147 Income-tax Officer v. Vohra Solvex (P.) Ltd. Reopening proceedings based solely on third-party statements without independent enquiry is void ab initio. Click Here Income-tax Act, 1961
147 Income-tax Officer (International Taxation) v. Ratan Kumar Ingu Reopening of assessment for AY 2017-18 invalid; transaction related to AY 2016-17. Click Here Income-tax Act, 1961
153C Kishore Kumar Sharma v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Notice and consequential proceedings under section 153C quashed; satisfaction note did not refer to any incriminating material for relevant years. Click Here Income-tax Act, 1961
153D Dheeraj Chaudhary v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Impugned approval under section 153D was invalid as it was granted mechanically without application of mind, vitiating assessment orders. Click Here Income-tax Act, 1961

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAW 17.09.2025