Important Income Tax Case Law 19.09.2025

By | September 20, 2025

Important Income Tax Case Law 19.09.2025

 

SECTIONCASE LAW TITLEBrief SummaryCitationRelevant Act
10(37)Sanjay Kumar Baid v. Income-tax OfficerCompensation received for compulsory acquisition of agricultural land by the NHAI is exempt from income tax, as the exemption under the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 also applies to acquisitions under the National Highways Act, 1956.Click Here-tax Act, 1961; National Highways Act, 1956
11Jhaiji Shikshan Samiti v. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, ExemptionA charitable trust is entitled to exemption under sections 11 & 12 if the audit report in Form 10B is filed before the extended due date for the return, even if the return itself was filed a day earlier.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
69CGangadhar Agarwal v. Income-tax OfficerAddition for unexplained expenditure was deleted because the AO mistakenly treated manufacturer-wise brands as separate products, leading to incorrect quantitative analysis. The assessee’s reconciliations confirmed proper disclosure.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
194CCommissioner of Income-tax, TDS v. Dr. Balabhai Nanavati HospitalThe case concerning TDS on Annual Maintenance Contracts (AMC) for hospital equipment was remanded. The Tribunal was instructed to independently determine if TDS should be under sec. 194C (contract) or 194J (technical services) for each AMC.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
194JCommissioner of Income-tax, TDS v. Dr. Balabhai Nanavati HospitalA hospital correctly deducted TDS under sec. 194J (professional fees) for payments to consultant doctors. Since there was no employer-employee relationship (no fixed salary, doctors free to practice elsewhere), sec. 192 did not apply.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 18.09.2025

Category: Home

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com