IMPORTANT GST CASE LAW 21.09.2025

By | September 23, 2025

IMPORTANT GST CASE LAW 21.09.2025

SectionCase Law TitleBrief SummaryCitationRelevant Act
Classification of ServicesProtego Services LLP, In reThe AAR ruled that services for transportation and catering provided directly to school students are not exempt from GST, as the services were not rendered to the school administration but to the students themselves.Click HereCentral Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Section 29Ved Prakash Agarwal v. State of TelanganaThe Telangana High Court held that GST authorities should not adjudicate on disputes regarding the genuineness of a Will or succession. The GST registration of parties involved should be verified only after a civil court determines their rights.Click HereCentral Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Section 54GTL Infrastructure Ltd. vs. State of JharkhandThe Jharkhand High Court directed the refund of a pre-deposit amount to the assessee, which was deposited for an appeal under Section 107. The court found that the rejection of the refund application by an automated order could lead to undue enrichment of the state.Click HereCentral Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Section 73Sintex – BAPL Ltd. v. State of GujaratThe Gujarat High Court ruled that once a resolution plan is approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), all previous tax liabilities of the corporate debtor are extinguished, and no new demands can be raised against it.Click HereCentral Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Section 107Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Union of IndiaThe Bombay High Court set aside an order that rejected an appeal because the pre-deposit was made using the Electronic Credit Ledger instead of cash. The court directed that the appeal be restored and decided on its merits.Click HereCentral Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Section 130Tru Sound (P.) Ltd. v. State of Uttar PradeshThe Allahabad High Court ruled that proceedings for confiscation of goods and levy of penalty under Sections 130 and 122 are not appropriate for a case of alleged excess stock found during a survey. Instead, proceedings under Section 73 or 74 for tax demands should be initiated.Click HereCentral Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017

For More :- Read Important GST Case Law 20.09.2025

Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com