IMPORTANT Income Tax Case Law 03.10.2025
SECTION | CASE LAW TITLE | Brief Summary | CITATION | RELEVANT ACT |
148 & 10(4)(ii) | Anilkumar Ramabhai Patel vs. Income-tax Officer | Reassessment proceedings against an NRI were quashed because the assessee duly explained that the remittance was from his overseas savings to his NRE account, the income of which is exempt. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
35(2AB) | Apollo Tyres Ltd. vs. ACIT | The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, denying the assessee a weighted deduction for R&D expenses because the mandatory DSIR approval was obtained after the relevant assessment years. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
11 | CIT (Exemption) vs. Anjana Foundation | The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, affirming that the non-filing of the Form 10B audit report is a procedural lapse, and a charitable trust cannot be denied Section 11 benefits solely on this ground. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
153C | ACIT vs. Kishore Kumar Sharma | The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, upholding the decision to quash a notice u/s 153C because the AO’s satisfaction note lacked any reference to incriminating material. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
AOP Assessment | PCIT vs. Ramesh Chandra Rai | The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, holding that income earned by a liquor syndicate (an AOP) must be assessed in the hands of the AOP itself, not in the individual hands of its members. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
147 & 32 | ACIT vs. P.C. Patel and Company | The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP against quashing a reopening notice. An AO cannot reopen an assessment on an issue (higher depreciation on tippers) that was already decided in the assessee’s favour in a prior year. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
2(47) | Ramesh Kumar vs. ACIT | No capital gains arise from a property conveyance if a ‘transfer’ as defined u/s 2(47) did not occur. This was the case here, as there was no registered sale agreement or Power of Attorney during the relevant year. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 29.09.2025