IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 20.12.2025
| Relevant Act | Section | Case Law Title | Brief Summary | Citation |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 2(15) | Federation of European Business in India v. CIT (Exemption) | Promoting trade between the EU and India through policy advocacy (trade policy, investment protection) qualifies as an object of General Public Utility. Assessee is eligible for S. 12A registration. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 2(15) | ACIT, Exemptions v. Vyakti Vikas Kendra India | Providing practical and theoretical yoga training is covered under the category of ‘imparting of education’, entitling the trust to exemptions under Sections 11 and 12. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 2(22)(e) | DCIT v. Prestige Holiday Resorts (P.) Ltd. | Outstanding payables arising from commercial transactions (sale/purchase of timeshare weeks) with wholly-owned subsidiaries are not “loans or advances” and cannot be treated as deemed dividends. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 32 | DCIT v. Prestige Holiday Resorts (P.) Ltd. | Sums paid to remove encumbrances on repossessed timeshare weeks represent cost of improvement to a tangible asset (building block) and are eligible for depreciation. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 32(1) | PCIT v. Aculife Healthcare (P.) Ltd. | [Landmark SC Ruling] SLP dismissed; Goodwill arising during demerger/amalgamation (difference between net assets and shares issued) is an intangible asset eligible for depreciation under Explanation 3(b) to S. 32(1). | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 37(1) | Alex Grinders (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT | Payment made to a labour union to facilitate a settlement with workers is allowable as business expenditure based on the test of commercial expediency. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 69 | PCIT, Central v. Milan Kavin Parikh | Addition based on an HSBC (Suisse) bank “base note” provided by the French Government was rejected because the note was obtained post-search and was not recovered during the actual search action. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 80P(2)(d) | Vihan Vibhag Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. v. ITO | Interest income from investments made in a Co-operative Bank is eligible for deduction as the bank is a registered co-operative society. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 143 | DCIT v. Prestige Holiday Resorts (P.) Ltd. | An assessment order passed in the name of a non-existing company (after conversion to an LLP) is void ab initio if the AO was notified of the conversion. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 153A | PCIT v. J Kumar Infraprojects Ltd. | Additions made in a search assessment (S. 153A) without finding any incriminating material during the search are invalid. No substantial question of law arises as this follows settled precedents. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 153D | Minto Developers (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT, Central | Summary, mechanical approval given by the Joint Commissioner without examining draft orders vitiates the entire assessment order, which must be annulled. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 270A | Srinivasa Gandhi Sampath v. ACIT | Penalty for under-reporting is unsustainable where the assessed income is identical to the returned income and the only dispute is the quantum of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC). | Click Here |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 19.12.2025