General Penalty for Late Returns Upheld Even Without Section 47 Late Fee Imposition
Issue
Whether the imposition of a general penalty for late filing of GST returns is valid and sustainable even when the specific late fee prescribed under Section 47 of the GST Act has not been levied.
Facts
Assessment Period: The dispute pertains to the tax period 2019-2020.
Default: The assessee failed to file their GST returns within the prescribed due dates.
Penalty Imposed: The tax authorities imposed a general penalty of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. 25,000/- under CGST and Rs. 25,000/- under SGST) for the non-compliance.
Observation: It was noted that despite the delay, no specific late fee under Section 47 of the respective GST enactments had been imposed on the assessee.
Legal Challenge: The assessee filed a writ petition on 23-10-2025 challenging the imposition of this general penalty.
Decision
Non-Interference: The Court held that the impugned order imposing a general penalty did not suffer from any infirmity requiring judicial interference.
Penalty Sustained: The fact that a specific late fee under Section 47 was not imposed did not invalidate the general penalty levied for the established default of late filing.
Outcome: The writ petition was dismissed, and the penalty order was upheld. [In favour of revenue]
Key Takeaways
General Penalty Scope: Authorities may impose a general penalty for procedural lapses (like late filing) under the GST Act, and this can stand independently even if the specific “late fee” under Section 47 is not separately charged in the order.
Compliance is Mandatory: The absence of a specific late fee levy does not absolve the taxpayer of liability for non-compliance; the general penalty provisions can still be invoked to penalize the delay.
W.M.P. Nos. 45001, 45005, 45006 and 45007 of 2025
| S.No. | SCN DATE | REPLY BY PETITIONER | IMPUGNED ORDER DATE | DEMAND RAISED | DEMAND PAID |
| 1. | 05.08.2023 | 07.09.2023, 27.09.2023 and 15.12.2023 | 28.08.2024 | Rs.50,000/-(as penalty). No tax demand | Interest paid |
| 2. | 27.05.2024 | No Reply | 24.08.2024 | Rs.3,00,882/- as tax demand | Rs.3,00,882/-(100% tax demand paid) |
| 3. | 28.05.2024 | No Reply | 22.08.2024 | Rs.42,765/- (as interest). No tax demand | Nil |
| 4. | 23.05.2024 | No Reply | 28.08.2024 | Rs.3,19,530/- as tax demand | Nil |
| (i) | the challenge to the assessment order dated 28.08.2024 bearing ZD3308242615954 is dismissed. |
| (ii) | the remaining impugned orders at Serial Nos. 2 to 4 in the above table are disposed of by way of remand, subject to the petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax. |
| (iii) | To the extent the tax demand already been recovered, the same shall be adjusted towards the pre-deposit as ordered above and no further pre-deposit is required, if the entire tax demand is already recovered. |
| (iv) | The attachment of the petitioner’s bank account shall be lifted, subject to the petitioner complying with the above stipulation and the petitioner not in arrears of any other amount towards the tax demand for other financial years. |
| (v) | In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically raised/vacated. |
| (vi) | . In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today. |