IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 30.01.2026
| Relevant Act | Section | Case Law Title | Brief Summary | Citation |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 80-IA(4) | PCIT v. Montecarlo Ltd. | [Developer vs Contractor] Deduction u/s 80-IA(4) is available to an assessee acting as a Developer (assuming financial risk and investment) and not merely executing a Works Contract. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 68 | PCIT v. Neelu Mahansaria | [LTCG Genuineness] LTCG on share sales cannot be treated as unexplained cash credit if the assessee produces complete documents, banking channel proof, and a favorable SEBI inquiry report. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 80AC / 80P | Chikkamudnoor Milk Producers v. ITO | [Mandatory Deadline] Deduction u/s 80P is strictly barred if the return is filed beyond the due date prescribed u/s 139(1), as per the mandatory provisions of Section 80AC. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 151 | Venkata Prasad Pulipati v. ITO | [Sanction Defect] Reassessment is invalid if approval for a notice issued beyond 3 years is obtained from the Principal Commissioner instead of the “specified authority” mandated u/s 151(ii). | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 270A | Gunmala Jain v. ITO | [Political Donation Withdrawal] Withdrawing a donation claim (Section 80GGC) without a valid explanation (other than “buying peace”) during audit warrants a penalty for misreporting u/s 270A(9). | Click Here |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 27.01.2026