IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 07.03.2026
| Relevant Act | Section | Case Law Title / Authority | Brief Summary | Citation |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 29 | S.K.Tripathi v. State of U.P. | Cancellation of registration via a non-speaking order (no reasons assigned) is arbitrary and violates Article 14 of the Constitution. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 73 | Md Shoriful Islam v. State of Assam | SCN and Orders (DRC-01/07) are legally ineffective if they lack digital authentication. ‘Sd- Proper Officer’ is not a substitute for a digital signature. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 73 | Md Shoriful Islam v. State of Assam | Issuing only a summary (DRC-01) without a detailed SCN specifying statutory reasons is contrary to law and vitiates demand proceedings. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 75 | Md Shoriful Islam v. State of Assam | Denial of a personal hearing when requested (or when an adverse order is contemplated) violates Section 75(4) and principles of natural justice. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 98 | Imperial Graphics (P.) Ltd., In re | AAR cannot rule on third-party supplies. An applicant can only seek a ruling on supplies they personally undertake or propose to undertake. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 113 | HSBC Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra | GSTAT has the inherent power to grant interim stay on recovery. Petitioners should approach the Tribunal for relief rather than the High Court. | Click Here |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 06.03.2026