Revocation of GST Registration Cancellation Allowed Upon Payment of Dues

By | January 28, 2025

Revocation of GST Registration Cancellation Allowed Upon Payment of Dues

Summary in Key Points:

  • Issue: Whether the cancellation of an assessee’s GST registration can be revoked when the assessee has not filed returns for a continuous period but is willing to comply by filing returns and paying outstanding dues.
  • Facts: The assessee’s registration was cancelled for non-filing of GST returns for six months. The assessee expressed willingness to file all pending returns and pay any outstanding tax, interest, and penalty.
  • Decision: The High Court, following the precedent set in Mohanty Enterprises v. Commissioner, CT & GST, allowed the assessee to apply for revocation of the cancellation order upon fulfilling certain conditions.

Decision:

The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing them to apply for revocation of the cancellation of their GST registration upon fulfilling the following conditions:

  • Filing of Returns: The assessee must furnish all pending GST returns, which they failed to submit earlier.
  • Payment of Dues: The assessee must deposit all outstanding dues of tax, interest, and penalty along with their application for revocation.
  • Consideration by Authority: Upon receiving the application with the pending returns and dues, the competent authority should consider the assessee’s application and pass an appropriate order.

Important Note: This case demonstrates the High Court’s inclination towards allowing taxpayers to rectify their mistakes and continue their business operations if they demonstrate a genuine willingness to comply with GST regulations. By giving the assessee a chance to revoke the cancellation, the court encourages tax compliance and facilitates business continuity. This approach aligns with the principles of natural justice and provides a fair opportunity to taxpayers who are willing to fulfill their tax obligations.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Rakesh Kumar
v.
State Tax Officer
Pankaj Purohit, J.
WRIT PETITION (M/S) No. 3283 of 2024
DECEMBER  6, 2024
Rohit Arora, learned counsel for the Petitioner. Mohit Maulekhi, learned Brief Holder for the Respondent.
JUDGMENT
Pankaj Purohit, J. – Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:-
“It is therefore, most respectfully prayed, that this Hon’ble High Court shall most graciously be pleased to:-
a.Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned Order for Cancellation of Registration bearing Reference No. ZA0512220150146 dated 20/12/2022 (Annexure-1) issued by the Respondent;
b.Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned Show Cause Notice for Cancellation of Registration bearing Reference No. ZA051222006324A dated 09/12/2022 (Annexure-2) issued by the Respondent;
c.Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent to revive the GST registration of the Petitioner;
d.Issue any other writ, order or direction and/or allow any other consequential relief as expedient in law, on the facts and circumstances of the case.”
3. Petitioner is a proprietorship firm who runs a business under the name and style of ‘M/s Durga Gift and Crockery Centre’. Petitioner is registered under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short “the CGST Act, 2017”).
4. The registration of the petitioner has been cancelled by respondent vide order dated 20.12.2022 for non filing of the GST return for a continuous period of six months.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that now the petitioner is ready to make the payment towards GST return for a period of six months as well as the penalty and interest, if any, imposed by the respondent-department.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that identical controversy has been decided by this Court in WPMS No.2285 of 2024.
7. The said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner has not been opposed by learned State Counsel.
8. In view of the consensus between the parties, the matter is covered by the order passed in WPMS No.2285 of 2024, the present writ petition is also decided in terms of the said order. The petitioner shall be at liberty to move an application for revocation or cancellation of the order under Section 30(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, within two weeks.
9. With this application, the petitioner shall also furnish all the GST returns, which he fails to submit and he will also deposit the outstanding dues of tax, interest and penalty of the goods and service tax with his application. If he makes such an application within stipulated period, the Competent Authority shall consider petitioner’s application and pass appropriate order as per law, within four weeks thereafter.
10. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
11. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com