Income Tax में अहम फैसला I Sales Tax deduction as business expense I CA Satbir Singh
Income Tax में अहम फैसला I Sales Tax deduction as business expense I CA Satbir Singh Download Click here
Category Archives: Income Tax Judgments
Extension of ITR and Tax Audit Date AY 2020-21 : Gujarat High Court direction
Extension of ITR and Tax Audit Date AY 2020-21 HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants v. Union of India J.B. PARDIWALA AND ILESH J. VORA, JJ. R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13653 OF 2020 JANUARY 8, 2021 S.N. Soparkar , Sr. Adv. and B.S. Soparkar for the Petitioner. Varun Pate for the Respondent. JUDGMENT J.B. Pardiwala J. —The… Read More »
No TDS on Cash Withdrawal u/s 194N if it is not Income of recipient : High Court
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS Tirunelveli District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) G.R. SWAMINATHAN, J. W.P.(MD)NOS. 6102 TO 6125 OF 2020 & OTHERS W.M.P. (MD) NOS. 5291 TO 5314 OF 2020 && OTHERS JULY 27, 2020 D. Shanmugaraja Sethupathi, S. Ravikannan, K. Vinayagam and K. Ravi for the Petitioner. Mrs. S. Srimathy, SPI, Govt. Pleader and N.… Read More »
Education Cess allowed as Business Expenses deduction : HC
Education Cess allowed as Business Expenses HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY Sesa Goa Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI AND M.S. SONAK, JJ. TAX APPEAL NOS. 17 AND 18 OF 2013 FEBRUARY 28, 2020 JUDGMENT M.S. Sonak, J. – Heard Mr. R. G.Ramani, learned Senior Advocate who appears alongwith Ms. Srushti Patil for the Appellant… Read More »
No Time limit for making 27C declaration u/s 206C(1A) : ITAT
IN THE ITAT JAIPUR BENCH ‘A’ Eid Mohammad Nizamuddin v. Income Tax-officer SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT APPEAL NOS. 422 TO 424, 776 TO 778/JP/2018 [ASSESSMENT YEARS 2013-14 TO 2015-16] APRIL 15, 2020 Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. for the Appellant. K.C. Gupta for the Respondent. ORDER Vikram Singh Yadav, Accountant Member – These are… Read More »
Assessee allowed to raise grounds before ITAT even if no cross objection filed before CIT(A) : HC
HIGH COURT OF DELHI Sanjay Sawhney v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax VIPIN SANGHI AND SANJEEV NARULA, JJ. IT APPEAL NO. 834 OF 2019 MAY 18, 2020 S. Krishnan, Adv. for the Appellant. Zoheb Hossain for the Respondent. JUDGMENT Sanjeev Narula, J. – The present appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) is directed against the… Read More »
60% Depreciation allowed on Set Top Boxes : ITAT
60% Depreciation allowed on Set Top Boxes : ITAT we have no hesitation to hold that the transaction in the present case is that of a loan/Finance. After going through the various terms of the deed, we find that the only role of the lessor in the present arrangement is to finance the transaction of… Read More »
Amount collected for Building Development Fund from students is capital receipt , not taxable : ITAT
Amount collected for Building Development Fund from students is capital receipt,not taxable : ITAT sample copies of the receipts issued from which it was evident that the contributions to ‘Development Fund’ were not collected on monthly basis along with tuition fees for the month but the students paid contributions to Development Fund at their own… Read More »
Interest Exp disallowed if Sales to sister concern and amount not realized : HC
Interest Exp disallowed if Sales to sister concern and amount not realized : HC However, in the instant case, the Assessing Authority, by an order dated 31-3-2000 has held that the assessee mainly supplies its finished products to its sister concern namely M/s. Canara Wood and Plywood Pvt. Ltd. Mangalore, which is engaged in the… Read More »
No Dis allowance u/s 40(a) of Surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax as it is not a ‘fee or charge’ : HC
No Dis allowance u/s 40(a) of Surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax as it is not a ‘fee or charge’ : HC HIGH COURT OF KERALA Kerala State Beverages (Manufacturing and Marketing) Corporation Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax C. K. ABDUL REHIM AND T.V. ANILKUMAR, JJ. IT APPEAL NOS. 135, 146 & 313 OF… Read More »