IN THE ITAT BANGALORE BENCH ‘A’ Income Tax Officer, Ward I & TPS v. Basavaraj M Kudarikannur N.V. VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT APPEAL NOS. 1747 AND 1750 (BANG.) OF 2017 [ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14] JUNE 1, 2018 Sandeep Goel, Addl. CIT (DR) for the Appellant. ORDER N.V. Vasudevan, Judicial Member – These are… Read More »
IN THE ITAT SPECIAL BENCH, NEW DELHI CLC & Sons (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle- 3 (1), New Delhi G.D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT R.S. SYAL, VICE-PRESIDENT AND BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT APPEAL NO. 1976 DELHI OF 2006 [ASSESSMENT YEAR 2001-02] JULY 19, 2018 Rohit Jain, Adv. Deepesh Jain and Mrs. Meenal Goyal, CA’s for the Appellant. Vijay Varma for the… Read More »
We see no fetters on an Assessing Officer carrying out preliminary inquiries even before issuance of notice of reopening in order to collect information on the basis of which, he may either form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment or abandon any further inquiry, upon being satisfied that no such belief… Read More »
The goods were not shipped either on 01-10-2007 or on 05-10-2007, i.e., on the dates on which the impugned loans were taken. The question of payment of customs duty etc., would arise only upon shipment or receipt of goods. In fact, the assessee admits that the goods were expected to be shipped on the second… Read More »
The entire basis of the Revenue’s case is the statement made on the date of the seizure. The voluminous evidence filed by the respondent during the course of the assessment proceedings has been completely ignored on the ground that the same was not produced when the seizure was made. There is no requirement in law… Read More »
The Assessing Officer formed a belief that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment, on the ground that noticing a big mismatch between the returned income and cash transactions in the assessee’s bank accounts, queries were raised, which remained un-replied. This is contrary to the facts on record. The assessee had also furnished a copy… Read More »
Undisputedly, the trust was created on 01-04-1998 and application was moved on 25-05-1999. There was delay of 1 month 25 days for which assessee has moved an application requesting therein that the delay may be condoned and registration may be granted from the date of its inception. Though the Revenue was required to dispose off… Read More »
Issue : In respect of a particular elevator imported by the assessee for installation at one of its buildings, the rise of the rupee compared to the relevant foreign currency resulted in the cost of the equipment being effectively lowered by a sum in excess of Rs. 6 lakh. The assessing officer added this to… Read More »
Issue Property sold by the assessee comprises of staff quarters on which assessee had claimed depreciation. As per Assessing officer , it has to be treated as short term capital gain as per Section 50(1) of the Act It is the claim of the assessee that the property sold is land, hence it has to… Read More »
HIGH COURT OF DELHI Abhishek Jain v. Income-tax officer, Ward-55(1), New Delhi SANJIV KHANNA AND CHANDER SHEKHAR, JJ. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11844 OF 2016 JUNE 1, 2018 Arvind Kumar and Harsh Vardhan Sharma, Advs. for the Petitioner. Ashok K. Manchandani, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Respondent. JUDGMENT Sanjiv Khanna, J. – Abhishek Jain, as an individual, has filed the present writ petition… Read More »