Category Archives: Judgements

Section 54 relief allowed for property purchased jointly with brother : ITAT

By | May 2, 2017

Facts of the Case Assessee was the owner of a flat in Jai Mahavir Apartment, J.P. Road at Andheri (West) jointly with his wife Mrs. Manisha J. Faria. The said flat was sold for Rs. 1,02,55,000/-. The assessee computed long term capital gains at Rs. 43,01,665/- being 50% share in the property. The assessee invested… Read More »

Cenvat refund cann’t be denied for non registration of premises

By | May 2, 2017

Held In absence of a statutory provision, prescribing that,  registration of the premises was mandatory for availing input service tax credit, the Assessee could not be denied refund of unutilized cenvat credit on input services. Madras High Court Commissioner of Service Tax-III Vs Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal  Appeal Number : C.M.A. No.… Read More »

Assessee failed to utilize capital gains within 3 years, Sec 54F can’t be denied during assessment

By | April 30, 2017

Held As per proviso to sub-section (4) of Section 54F if the amount deposited in capital gain account is not utilized wholly or partly for purchase or construction of new asset within the period specified in sub-section (1) then the amount of capital gain shall be charged under Section 45 as income of the previous… Read More »

Black money received from sale of Agriculture Land is also not Taxable ; ITAT

By | April 30, 2017

Facts of the Case The assessee was asked to explain the source of cash deposits in Federal Bank amounting to Rs.80 lakhs. The assessee vide letter dated 30/11/2015 stated that he and his wife had sold agricultural for Rs.70,79,500/- which was deposited in Federal Bank and balance cash deposits are out of agricultural income. The… Read More »

Income of foreign shipping company not taxable in India under ‘ place of effective management ‘ test

By | April 29, 2017

Income of a foreign shipping company not taxable in India under “place of effective management” test: The Rajkot Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal held that under Article 9 of the India-Denmark income tax treaty, earned by a foreign company from operations of ships in international traffic is not taxable in India because the place of effective… Read More »

Tax on Waiver of interest in the hands of amalgamating company

By | April 29, 2017

Waiver of interest in the hands of amalgamating company: The Supreme Court of India held that waiver of interest due by amalgamating company to financial institutions is taxable in the hands of the amalgamated company under section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.The case is: Mcdowell & Company Ltd. Read an April 2017 report [PDF 309 KB]… Read More »

Liaison office of a multinational company is permanent establishment

By | April 29, 2017

40% profit attributed to Indian operations of taxpayer: The Bengaluru Bench of Income-tax Appellate Tribunal held that a liaison office of a multinational company conducting activities that are not “preparatory and auxiliary” constitutes a permanent establishment. The case is: Arrow Electronic India Ltd. Read an April 2017 report [PDF 420 KB] of KPMG

Sale of business on “ going concern ” basis is “ slump sale ” and not sale of depreciable asset

By | April 29, 2017

Sale of business on “going concern” basis is “slump sale” and not a sale of depreciable asset: The Supreme Court of India, in a case that arose prior to the introduction of slump sale provisions, held that sale of an entire running business on a “going concern” basis is a slump sale under section 50(2)… Read More »

Race car circuit constitutes “fixed place PE” under India-United Kingdom income tax treaty:

By | April 29, 2017

Race car circuit constitutes “fixed place PE” under the India-United Kingdom income tax treaty: The Supreme Court of India held that an international circuit constitutes fixed place of business under the India-UK income tax treaty, since the circuit was under the control and at the disposal of the taxpayer. The case is: Formula One World… Read More »