Assessment Order Quashed; Personal Hearing Mandated Under Section 75(4)

By | March 15, 2025

Assessment Order Quashed; Personal Hearing Mandated Under Section 75(4)

Issue: Whether an assessment order passed without granting a mandatory personal hearing under Section 75(4) of the GST enactments is valid.

Facts:

  • The assessee challenged an assessment order dated November 29, 2023, on the ground that it was passed without granting a mandatory personal hearing under Section 75(4) of the GST enactments.

Decision:

  • The court held that an assessment order passed without granting the personal hearing mandated under Section 75(4) of the GST enactments cannot be sustained.
  • The court set aside the impugned order.
  • The court remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer with a direction to grant a personal hearing to the assessee on December 19, 2024.
  • The court directed the Assessing Officer to pass fresh orders within three months from the date of the judgment or within the limitation period, whichever is later.
  • The writ petition was disposed of.

Key Takeaways:

  • Mandatory Personal Hearing: Section 75(4) mandates a personal hearing if requested by the assessee or if the authority intends to pass an adverse decision.
  • Invalid Assessment Order: An assessment order passed without granting the mandatory personal hearing is invalid.
  • Remittal for Fresh Assessment: When an assessment order is quashed for lack of a personal hearing, the matter is remitted to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment after granting the hearing.
  • Compliance with Section 75(4): Assessing Officers must comply with the provisions of Section 75(4) and grant a personal hearing when required.
  • Section 75 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017: This section deals with general provisions relating to determination of tax.
  • The court is reinforcing the need to comply with the statutory requirements for personal hearing, and ensuring due process.
HIGH COURT OF PATNA
M.D International
v.
Union of India
K. Vinod Chandran, CJ.
Partha Sarthy, J.
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15354 of 2024
NOVEMBER  28, 2024
Bijay Kumar Gupta, Adv. for the Petitioner. Dr. K.N. Singh, ASG for the Respondent.
JUDGMENT
K. Vinod Chandran, CJ. – The contentions raised in the present writ petition on limitation is answered in C.W.J.C. No. 4180 of 2024 and analogous cases, M/s Barhonia Engicon Private Limited v. The Union of India and Ors. vide judgment dated 27.11.2024, against the petitioner.
2. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the assessment order impugned has been passed without granting a personal hearing under Section 75(4) of the GST enactments, in which circumstance, the impugned order dated 29.11.2023 (Annexure-P3) and Annexure-P3A are set aside are set aside on violation of the statutory mandate for notice of personal hearing and the matter is remitted to the Assessing Officer directing the assessee to appear before the Assessing Officer on 19.12.2024. If he appears on the date notified, or on a date once adjourned, the Assessing Officer shall pass orders within three months from the date of this judgment or within the limitation period provided, if not expired, whichever falls later.
3.The writ petition stands disposed of with the above directions.
Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com