Request for photocopies of non-relied upon document Denied; Adjudication Concluded; Assessee Allowed to Challenge Final Order

By | March 12, 2025

Request for photocopies of non-relied upon document Denied; Adjudication Concluded; Assessee Allowed to Challenge Final Order

Issue: Whether the petitioner-assessee is entitled to photocopies of non-relied upon documents, seized materials, and an opportunity to inspect original records to file an effective reply to a show cause notice, especially when the adjudication proceedings have already concluded.

Facts:

  • The respondent department issued a show cause notice dated August 4, 2024, to the petitioner, relying on certain documents and statements.
  • The petitioner requested copies of all materials, including non-relied upon documents, seized materials detailed in the panchnama, and an opportunity to inspect original records.
  • The respondent provided some documents on January 20, 2025, just before the personal hearing date, which was concluded on January 27, 2025.
  • The petitioner argued that they were unable to furnish an effective response to the allegations due to the delayed provision of documents.
  • The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking directions to the respondent to provide photocopies of non-relied upon documents in original form to enable them to file a detailed and complete reply to the show cause notice.

Decision:

  • The court held that since the adjudication proceedings had already been concluded, directing the respondents to provide the requested documents would serve no purpose.
  • Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.
  • However, the court allowed the petitioner to challenge any adverse final order arising from the show cause notice on the ground of being deprived of a fair opportunity.

Key Takeaways:

  • Conclusion of Adjudication: Requests for documents may be denied if adjudication proceedings have already been concluded.
  • Challenge to Final Order: The assessee retains the right to challenge the final order on the ground of being deprived of a fair opportunity to respond to the show cause notice if they were not given access to the documents in a timely manner.
  • Fair Opportunity to Respond: The case emphasizes the importance of providing a fair and reasonable opportunity to the assessee to respond to the show cause notice and access necessary information.
  • Procedural Fairness: The decision highlights the need for procedural fairness in adjudication proceedings and ensures that assessees are not prejudiced by delays in receiving necessary documents.
  • The court is taking a practical approach, by not allowing the tax payer to get documents after the adjudication is over, but allowing them to challenge the final order if they were not given a fair chance.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Garg Exim
v.
Directorate General of GST Intelligence
Yashwant Varma and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, JJ.
W.P.(C) 738 of 2025
CM APPL. 3649 of 2025 (STAY)
JANUARY  24, 2025
Abhishek Pareek and Ravinder Pal, Advs. for the Petitioner. Shubham Tyagi, SSC. for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. This writ petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:-
“i. Issue a suitable writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1 to provide hard/photocopies of the Non-relied upon documents in original form, so as to enable the petitioner to file a detailed and complete reply to the show cause notice dated 04-08-2024;
ii. issue a suitable writ order or direction in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1 and 2 to allow the inspection of the original records and the material sought to be used against the petitioner in the adjudication proceedings;
iii. Issue a Writ / order or direction in the nature of writ of Mandamus be issued directing the Respondent No. 2 to grant an opportunity of a cross examination of the persons, whose statements have been relied upon in the show cause notice as contained in (ANNEXURE NO. 3) of this Writ Petition before the finalization of adjudication proceedings;
iv. issue any other and further writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner;
V. allow the petition with costs.”
2. The petitioner was essentially aggrieved by a failure on the part of the respondents to provide a copy of the various documents as well as electronic articles which had been seized from the petitioner and are detailed in the panchnama which has been placed on the record. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, despite such a request being made, the same was not acceded to.
3. We are further informed that some of the documents which had been seized were provided to the petitioner only as late as 20 January 2025 and that the personal hearing itself has been concluded yesterday. In view of the above, it is alleged that the petitioner was unable to furnish an effective response to the allegations leveled.
4. Although and initially, we were inclined to direct the respondents to provide copies of all material which had been seized and is noticed in the panchnama, in light of the closure of proceedings by the respondents no purpose would be served today by issuance of such a direction.
5. We thus dispose of the writ petition by providing that in case any final order adverse to the petitioner comes to be passed, it shall be open for the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings to assail the same and in which it shall be open for it to assert that it was deprived of an effective opportunity to respond to the allegations leveled.
6. All rights and contentions of respective parties on merits are kept open.
7. The writ petition shall stand disposed of on the aforesaid terms.
Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com