Reopening assessment under Section 153C is invalid if the incriminating material from a search pertains to an earlier financial year

By | June 2, 2025

Reopening assessment under Section 153C is invalid if the incriminating material from a search pertains to an earlier financial year and not the relevant assessment year.

Issue:

Whether an assessment for a particular year (Assessment Year 2021-22) can be reopened under Section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on a satisfaction note recorded during a search on a third party, if the incriminating material (a pen-drive containing information about accommodation entries) specifically pertains to a transaction from a much earlier financial year (Financial Year 2014-15) and not the relevant assessment year.

Facts:

  • For Assessment Year 2021-22, a satisfaction note was recorded by the Assessing Officer (AO) pursuant to a search conducted in the case of a “searched person” (a third party, not the assessee directly).
  • The satisfaction note indicated that a pen-drive was found during the search.
  • This pen-drive allegedly contained information regarding transactions entered into by the assessee with companies that had provided accommodation entries through the generation of bogus invoices.
  • However, it was specifically noted that the information allegedly found was regarding a purported transaction pertaining to Financial Year 2014-15.
  • The assessment sought to be reopened was for Assessment Year 2021-22.

Decision:

The court held in favor of the assessee. It ruled that the pen-drive found could not be considered as containing any “incriminating material” pertaining to the assessee in respect of the relevant assessment year (2021-22). Therefore, the assessee’s assessment for the said year could not be reopened under Section 153C.

Key Takeaways:

  • Scope of Section 153C (Assessment of Income of Other Person): Section 153C allows the AO of a “searched person” to hand over books of account, documents, or assets seized or requisitioned during a search, to the AO of “any other person” if the AO of the searched person is satisfied that such books, documents, or assets belong to or relate to such other person. The AO of the “other person” then proceeds to assess or reassess income for six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which the search was conducted,1 or for the relevant assessment year itself.
  • Crucial Condition: Incriminating Material for Relevant Year: For Section 153C to be validly invoked for a particular assessment year, the seized or requisitioned material must contain “incriminating material” that pertains to the relevant assessment year for which the assessment is being reopened.
  • Information for Past Years Only: If the incriminating material (like the pen-drive in this case) contains information solely related to a past financial year (FY 2014-15), it cannot be used to reopen an assessment for a much later, unrelated assessment year (AY 2021-22). The “incriminating material” must be relevant to the escaped income of the year sought to be assessed/reassessed.
  • Jurisdictional Prerequisite: The presence of incriminating material pertaining to the specific assessment year is a fundamental jurisdictional prerequisite for invoking Section 153C.
  • “In favour of assessee”: The quashing of the Section 153C proceedings means that the assessment for AY 2021-22 cannot be reopened based on this specific piece of evidence that is relevant to an earlier period.
  • Distinction from Section 147/148: While Section 147/148 deals with general reopening, Section 153C is a specific provision linked to search operations and requires that the material seized from a third party is incriminating for the assessee and relevant to the year being reopened.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Panch Tatva Promotors (P.) Ltd.
v.
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax
Vibhu Bakhru and Tejas Karia, JJ.
W.P.(C) No. 17394 OF 2024
CM APPL. No. 74046 and 74047 OF 2024
MAY  20, 2025
Somil Agarwal and Dushyant Agrawal, Advs. for the Petitioner. Siddhartha Sinha, Adv. for the Respondent.
ORDER
Vibhu Bakhru, J. – The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a notice dated 28.08.2024 [the impugned notice] issued under 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] as well as the proceedings for re assessment of the petitioner’s income in respect of Assessment Year (AY) 2021-22.
2. The impugned notice is premised on the satisfaction note of the Assessing Officer [AO] of Mr. Samir Modi and Ms. Shivani Modi (searched persons), which recorded that documents containing information pertaining to the petitioner were found during the search conducted in the case of searched persons on 03.02.2021.
3. Admittedly, the satisfaction note does not contain any information which may have a bearing on determining the petitioner’s income assessable in the AY 2021-22. The note indicates that during the course of the search, a pen-drive was found, which contained certain information regarding transactions entered into by HGEL (High Ground Enterprises Ltd.) with companies that had provided accommodation entries through generation of bogus invoices.
4. In so far as the petitioner is concerned, information allegedly found was regarding a purported transaction of Rs. 70,78,680/-, which was allegedly supported by bogus invoice. However, the said transaction pertains to the Financial Year 2014-15. Paragraph 13 of the satisfaction note is set out below:
“13. Further, during the search action, several digital devices were cloned and had been annexurised. In one red SanDisk pen drive which was cloned into the Hard-Disk marked as Annexure A3, the tally data of entities had been maintained. The Managing director of High Ground Enterprises Limited i.e. Sandeep Ramkrishna Arora admitted that transactions between High Ground Enterprise Limited and companies may not be 100 percent genuine. The pen drive contains all detailed transactions done by HGEL with the companies who may provided accommodation entries through generation of bogus invoices from FY 2014-15 to FY 2020-21.
Details of transaction of assessee to whom bogus service has been provided by HGEL
S.NO.Name of the AssesseePANFYAmount
1Panch Tatva Promoters Pvt LtdAAFCP6505P2014-1570,78,680
TOTAL70,78,680″

 

5. It is clear from the above that the information provided in the satisfaction note dated 28.08.2024 entered by the AO of the assessee could not possibly lead to the conclusion that the income of the Assessee for AY 2021-22 had escaped assessment. The pen drive found cannot be considered as containing any incriminating material pertaining to the petitioner in respect of AY 2021-22. Thus, the petitioner’s assessment for the said year could not be reopened under Section 153C of the Act.
6. Concededly, the aforesaid issue is covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society ITR 344 (SC) as well as the recent decision of this Court in Saksham Commodities Ltd. v. ITO (Delhi)/2024:DHC:2836-DB.
7. It is relevant to set out paragraph 68 of the said decision which reads as under:
68. The jurisdictional AO would have to firstly be satisfied that the material received is likely to have a bearing on or impact the total income of years or years which may form part of the block of six or ten AYs’ and thereafter proceed to place the assessee on notice under Section 153C. The power to undertake such an assessment would stand confined to those years to which the material may relate or is likely to influence. Absent any material that may either cast a doubt on the estimation of total income for a particular year or years, the AO would not be justified in invoking its powers conferred by Section 153C. It would only be consequent to such satisfaction being reached that a notice would be liable to be issued and thus resulting in the abatement of pending proceedings and reopening of concluded assessments.
[Emphasis added]
8. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the impugned notice issued under Section 153C of the Act in respect of AY 2021-22 is set aside.
9. The pending application is also disposed of.