IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 12.01.2026
| Relevant Act | Section | Case Law Title | Brief Summary | Citation |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 9 (Classification) | Dodla Dairy Ltd. v. Union of India | [Classification Dispute Settled] Flavoured milk is classifiable under Tariff Item 0402 99 90 and is subject to GST at the rate of 5%. The court rejected the higher rate often sought by revenue for “beverages containing milk”. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 16(2)(c) | Sahil Enterprises v. Union of India | [Major Relief on ITC] Section 16(2)(c) (requiring supplier to pay tax) must be “read down”. It applies only to collusive/fraudulent transactions. If the purchasing dealer is bona fide and paid tax to the supplier, ITC cannot be denied merely because the supplier failed to deposit it with the Government. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 54 (Refund) | Bluefish Pharmaceuticals (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India | [Not an Intermediary] A captive unit providing R&D services directly to its foreign parent company is not an ‘intermediary’. It qualifies as an export of services, entitling the assessee to a refund of accumulated ITC. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 73 (Demand) | Ashwani Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P. | [Proceedings Against Deceased] Show Cause Notice and ex-parte order issued against a deceased sole proprietor (after the department was informed and registration cancelled) were held invalid and void ab initio. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 93 (Liability) | Baratam Satish v. Joint Commissioner of Central Tax | [Legal Heir Liability] Assessment for a deceased person must formally involve the legal representative who holds the estate. A direct assessment order against a legal heir without following the specific procedure of Section 93 is invalid. | Click Here |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 09.01.2026