IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 16.01.2026
| Relevant Act | Section | Case Law Title | Summary | Citation |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 7 & 18(3) | Shilpa Medicare Ltd. v. Union of India | [Going Concern Exemption] Transfer of a business unit (e.g., from AP to Karnataka) as a going concern without consideration is an exempt supply of service. Furthermore, unutilized CGST and IGST credit can be transferred to the new unit u/s 18(3). | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 54 | Virtusa Systems (India) v. Union of India | [Intermediary vs Export] IT software and testing services provided directly to a foreign parent are Exports, not intermediary services. Rejection of refund based on “borrowed findings” from earlier periods without fresh evidence is illegal. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 107 | Hariom Industries v. State of Gujarat | [Non-Condonable Delay] High Courts cannot use Article 226 to condone an appeal delay beyond the statutory 120 days (3 months + 1 month extension). The taxing statute operates in a strict timeframe that writ jurisdiction cannot dilute. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 161 | Shree Bharat Motors v. Chief Commissioner | [Rectification Rights] Rejection of a rectification application regarding excess ITC without verifying reconciliations or granting a hearing is a legal infirmity. Authorities must consider portal data on record. | Click Here |
| CGST Act, 2017 | Section 9 | Snag & Bag Retail Pvt. Ltd., In re | [Merchant Trade GST] If an Indian entity buys from Spain and sells to the USA (goods move outside India), but the title transfers between two Indian entities, GST is payable. Para 7 of Sch III is only for non-taxable territory supplies. | Click Here |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 13.01.2026