IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 29.09.2025
| SECTION | CASE LAW TITLE | Brief Summary | Citation | Relevant Act |
| – | Ruchika Industries vs. Union of India | The matter was remanded as the assessee could not file a reply to the Show Cause Notice (SCN) due to stress from medical issues, and was granted a fresh opportunity. | Click Here | GST |
| – | New Allied LPG appliances vs. Sales Tax Officer Class II/AVATO | An ex-parte order was set aside because the SCN was uploaded on the portal’s ‘Additional Notices’ tab, denying the assessee a proper opportunity to be heard. | Click Here | GST |
| – | Mohini Traders vs. State of U.P. | The High Court refused to interfere with confiscation and penalty orders where the e-way bill was generated much after the goods were intercepted by authorities. | Click Here | GST |
| – | Kanha Polymers vs. Additional Commissioner, CGST, Delhi North | The High Court held that a single, consolidated SCN can be issued for multiple years in cases involving the fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). | Click Here | GST |
| – | Indiana Steel Corporation vs. Joint Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Thiruvananthapuram | Orders were set aside for breach of natural justice because the assessee was not given a reasonable opportunity to cross-examine key witnesses. | Click Here | GST |
| – | Harbhajan Singh Thukral vs. Government of NCT of Delhi Department of Trade and Taxes | The High Court directed revenue to process a refund from the electronic cash ledger, with interest, as the demand against which it was adjusted was already cancelled. | Click Here | GST |
| Sec. 168 | Mahadev Transport and Contractors vs. Assistant Commissioner | An assessment order issued without a Document Identification Number (DIN) is invalid but remains effective unless and until it is officially set aside by a court. | Click Here | GST |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT GST CASW LAWS 28.09.2025