IMPORTANT Income Tax Case Law 03.10.2025

By | October 4, 2025

IMPORTANT Income Tax Case Law 03.10.2025

 

SECTIONCASE LAW TITLEBrief SummaryCITATIONRELEVANT ACT
148 & 10(4)(ii)Anilkumar Ramabhai Patel vs. Income-tax OfficerReassessment proceedings against an NRI were quashed because the assessee duly explained that the remittance was from his overseas savings to his NRE account, the income of which is exempt.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
35(2AB)Apollo Tyres Ltd. vs. ACITThe Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, denying the assessee a weighted deduction for R&D expenses because the mandatory DSIR approval was obtained after the relevant assessment years.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
11CIT (Exemption) vs. Anjana FoundationThe Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, affirming that the non-filing of the Form 10B audit report is a procedural lapse, and a charitable trust cannot be denied Section 11 benefits solely on this ground.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
153CACIT vs. Kishore Kumar SharmaThe Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, upholding the decision to quash a notice u/s 153C because the AO’s satisfaction note lacked any reference to incriminating material.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
AOP AssessmentPCIT vs. Ramesh Chandra RaiThe Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, holding that income earned by a liquor syndicate (an AOP) must be assessed in the hands of the AOP itself, not in the individual hands of its members.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
147 & 32ACIT vs. P.C. Patel and CompanyThe Supreme Court dismissed the SLP against quashing a reopening notice. An AO cannot reopen an assessment on an issue (higher depreciation on tippers) that was already decided in the assessee’s favour in a prior year.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
2(47)Ramesh Kumar vs. ACITNo capital gains arise from a property conveyance if a ‘transfer’ as defined u/s 2(47) did not occur. This was the case here, as there was no registered sale agreement or Power of Attorney during the relevant year.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961

For More :- Read IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 29.09.2025