IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAW 17.09.2025

By | September 19, 2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAW 17.09.2025

SECTIONCASE LAW TITLEBrief SummaryCitationRelevant Act
N/APress ReleaseThe CBDT has extended the due date for filing the Income Tax Return for the Assessment Year 2025-26 by one day, from September 15, 2025, to September 16, 2025.Press Release, Dated 15-09-2025Income-tax Act, 1961
10(46)NotificationThe CBDT has notified the “Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission” under section 10(46) with retrospective effect from the assessment year 2024-25.Click Here

 

Income-tax Act, 1961
11Smt. Ramanandi Anangpuria Charitable Trust v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions)A donation claimed as a corpus donation without a written direction from the donor does not qualify as corpus under section 11(1)(d).Click Here

 

Income-tax Act, 1961
11Smt. Ramanandi Anangpuria Charitable Trust v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions)The denial of exemption u/s 11 (invoking s. 13(1)(c)) was remanded to the AO for fresh consideration as it was connected to the genuineness of loans, an issue which was also remanded.Click HereIncome-tax Act, 1961
13Smt. Ramanandi Anangpuria Charitable Trust v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions)The disallowance of interest paid to related parties was remitted back to the AO for re-examination as the issue was intrinsically linked to the genuineness of the underlying unsecured loans.Click Here

 

Income-tax Act, 1961
54FACIT v. Merilina FoundationExemption under Section 54F cannot be denied to a private trust set up for identified beneficiaries merely because it is a trust; the restriction applies to charitable trusts, not private ones.Click Here

 

Income-tax Act, 1961
68Smt. Ramanandi Anangpuria Charitable Trust v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions)The issue of unexplained unsecured loans was remitted to the AO for fresh verification after the assessee filed additional evidence before the Tribunal, citing a lack of proper advice earlier.Click Here

 

Income-tax Act, 1961
68R S Alloys v. Income-tax OfficerReassessment was justified based on information that the assessee had entered into bogus accommodation entries with a company that was a known defaulter with business volumes not matching its ITR.Click Here

 

Income-tax Act, 1961
69AEkambaram Elumalai v. Income-tax OfficerA notice issued under section 148 without quoting a Document Identification Number (DIN) is invalid, non est, and therefore, infructuous.Click Here

 

Income-tax Act, 1961
115BAAGem Nuts & produce Exports Co. (P.) Ltd v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-1A 15-day delay in filing Form 10IC to opt for the concessional tax regime u/s 115BAA was condoned, as the delay was due to an oversight by the Chartered Accountant.Click Here

 

Income-tax Act, 1961
149Sainik Co-operative House Building Society Ltd. v. Income-tax OfficerA reassessment notice for AY 2013-14 issued on July 25, 2022, was quashed as it was barred by limitation, the deadline being June 26, 2022, as clarified by the Supreme Court.Click Here

 

Income-tax Act, 1961
151AEkambaram Elumalai v. Income-tax OfficerFollowing the CBDT notification dated March 29, 2022, a notice under section 148 must be issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), making a notice issued by the jurisdictional AO invalid.Click Here

 

Income-tax Act, 1961
234AKeller Asia Pacific Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-taxNo interest under section 234A is chargeable if the assessee files the return of income within the extended time limit set by the CBDT.Click Here

 

Income-tax Act, 1961
271DBeyond Research and Development Ltd. v. Income-tax OfficerAn ex-parte penalty order under section 271D was quashed for violating the principles of natural justice because it was passed without granting an opportunity of hearing, despite a request.Click Here

 

Income-tax Act, 1961

 

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 10.06.2025