IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 12.02.2026
| Relevant Section | Case Law Title | Core Ruling / Summary | Citation |
| Section 14A / 144B | Captain Pramod Kumar Bajaj v. UOI | [Selection Bias] The SC quashed the rejection of a candidate for ITAT Member because the selection committee included an officer who had faced contempt proceedings from that candidate. Justice must also appear to be done. | Click Here |
| Section 2(14) | Anshu Dhawan v. ITO | Rights in an allotted residential unit (even before possession) are a “Capital Asset.” Transfer via registered agreement results in a Capital Loss/Gain, not a personal loss. | Click Here |
| Section 12A / 13 | C-Dot Forum v. CIT(E) | Registration was denied where funds were largely spent on luxurious hospitality/entertainment for doctors (funded by Pharma companies) rather than actual charitable activities. | Click Here |
| Section 80IA(8) | India Cements Ltd. v. DCIT | For captive power plants, market value for deduction must be based on SEB consumer rates (what it would cost to buy) rather than generation tariffs (what it costs to produce). | Click Here |
| Section 271AAB | Chandrasekaran Joseph Vijay v. DCIT | [Limitation Rule] Penalty limitation for search cases is governed by Section 275(1)(a) if an appeal is pending. The penalty order must follow the conclusion of the appellate proceedings. | Click Here |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 11.02.2026