IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 17.02.2026
| Section | Case Law Title | Core Ruling / Summary | Citation |
| Section 11 | ACIT v. Anandilal & Ganesh Podar Society | [Applied Income] Provisions for gratuity and leave encashment on an actuarial basis constitute the “application of income” u/s 11, even without immediate cash outflow. | Click Here |
| Section 54F | Mahesh Shrivastava v. ITO | [Exemption Limit] The deeming fiction of Section 50C applies only for computing gains; for Section 54F, “net consideration” is determined by the actual amount reinvested. | Click Here |
| Section 151 | Arvindbhai Khatri Sons v. ACIT | [Sanction Defect] Reopening notices beyond 3 years require sanction from the Principal Chief Commissioner. Approval by a lower authority quashes the proceeding. | Click Here |
| Section 194A | Motor & General Sales Ltd v. ITO | [Jewellery Schemes] Discounts given to customers at the end of an installment-based jewellery scheme are commercial discounts, not “interest.” No TDS required. | Click Here |
| Section 276B | Jyotsana Investments v. R.K. De | [Compounding] Once a compounding fee is paid and accepted for a TDS default, continuing criminal prosecution is an abuse of process and must be quashed. | Click Here |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 16.02.2026