| Section |
Case Law Title |
Brief Summary |
Citation |
Relevant Act |
| 12AB |
Hatkeshwar Mahadev Trust v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) |
Denial of registration to charitable trust unjustified; objects catering to a religious caste are permissible if income isn’t applied for that specific benefit and no violation inquiry was made. |
Click Here |
Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 50C |
Pavanchandra Chit Funds (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax |
Upholding AO’s adoption of SRO value for capital gains; remanded for re-adjudication of deductions for Building UDA development and conversion charges. |
Click Here |
Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 54B, 263 |
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Kanubhai Vanmalibhai Patel HUF |
SLP dismissed; AO’s detailed inquiry and allowance of deduction under section 54B was a legally sustainable view, so PC’s order under section 263 was not upheld. |
Click Here |
Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 64 |
Sushama Rajesh Rao v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax |
Capital gain from sale of agricultural land gifted to assessee by husband is taxable in the hands of the husband. |
Click Here |
Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 68, 151(2) |
Sunidhi Securities & Finance Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax |
Reopening notice for AY 2015-16 invalid; sanction for reassessment notice obtained from Principal Commissioner instead of Joint Commissioner. |
Click Here |
Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 68, 148A(d), 148 |
Balkrishna Mangaldas Thakkar v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax |
Reopening order and notice not sustainable; assessee’s temporary loan transaction was genuine and through banking channels. |
Click Here |
Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 69 |
Pavanchandra Chit Funds (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax |
Matter remanded to AO for verification of re-transfer of land as no cash payment was made; re-transfer should not be treated as unexplained investment. |
Click Here |
Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 69B, 153C |
Jaihan Infrastructure v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax |
Assessee should be given an opportunity of being heard before reassessment is concluded based on search material. |
Click Here |
Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 69C |
Income-tax Officer v. Vohra Solvex (P.) Ltd. |
Purchases cannot be treated as bogus when documentary evidence is provided and books are not rejected; only profit element can be added. |
Click Here |
Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 69C, 147 |
Income-tax Officer v. Vohra Solvex (P.) Ltd. |
Reopening proceedings based solely on third-party statements without independent enquiry is void ab initio. |
Click Here |
Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 147 |
Income-tax Officer (International Taxation) v. Ratan Kumar Ingu |
Reopening of assessment for AY 2017-18 invalid; transaction related to AY 2016-17. |
Click Here |
Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 153C |
Kishore Kumar Sharma v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax |
Notice and consequential proceedings under section 153C quashed; satisfaction note did not refer to any incriminating material for relevant years. |
Click Here |
Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 153D |
Dheeraj Chaudhary v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax |
Impugned approval under section 153D was invalid as it was granted mechanically without application of mind, vitiating assessment orders. |
Click Here |
Income-tax Act, 1961 |
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAW 17.09.2025