IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 26.02.2026
| Relevant Section | Case Law Title | Core Ruling & Strategic Summary | Citation |
| Section 205 | ITO v. Gayatri Snehal Rao | [Landmark SC] If an employer deducts TDS from salary but fails to deposit it with the Govt, the Revenue cannot raise a direct demand against the employee. Section 205 creates a total bar against such recovery. | Click Here |
| Section 32 | Aptara Technologies v. DCIT | [Artificial Goodwill] Amalgamation resulting in the “artificial creation” of goodwill without real business acquisition or commercial substance is a colourable device. Depreciation on such goodwill is to be disallowed. | Click Here |
| Section 50 | N.K. Gems v. ITO | [Block of Assets] New commercial premises are considered “acquired” once the registered agreement is executed and full consideration is paid. Possession or “put to use” is not required for inclusion in the block. | Click Here |
| Section 271D | JCIT v. G. S. V. Amarendra | [Penalty Quashed] Penalty u/s 271D (Cash Loans) cannot be levied if the AO fails to record a specific finding of Section 269SS violation or record satisfaction during the assessment order. | Click Here |
| Section 44C | ANZ Banking Group Ltd. v. DCIT | [Head Office Expenses] Telecom charges and expatriate personnel costs incurred exclusively for the Indian branch are Business Expenses u/s 37(1) and not “General Administrative” expenses capped u/s 44C. | Click Here |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 25.02.2026