IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 31.01.2026
| Relevant Act | Section | Case Law Title | Brief Summary | Citation |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 11 / 13 | Sri Srinivasa Educational & Charitable Trust v. DCIT | [Search Relief for Trusts] Inconclusive DVO reports and surmises regarding “fund diversion” are insufficient to deny exemption. The Court upheld COVID relief expenditure as genuine despite informal documentation given the emergency context. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 153B | Sri Srinivasa Educational & Charitable Trust v. DCIT | [Limitation Period] Panchnamas drawn merely to revoke restraint orders (u/s 132(3)) cannot extend the limitation period for completing search assessments. Assessments completed beyond the time limit from the last valid panchnama are void. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 14A | DCIT v. Lotus Herbals (P.) Ltd. | [Restrictive Disallowance] Disallowance u/s 14A must be restricted to the average value of only those investments which actually yielded exempt income during the year, not the total investment pool. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 151 | Integrated Service Point Ltd. v. Dy./Asst. CIT | [Sanction Authority] If a notice u/s 148 is issued after 3 years, approval must be from the Principal CCIT. Approval from a Member (Inv.), CBDT, is incompetent, rendering the reassessment invalid. | Click Here |
| Income-tax Act, 1961 | Section 205 | AO v. Shobhan Shantilal Doshi | [TDS Credit SC Ruling] The SC set aside specific High Court directions for “software modification” but did not disturb the principle that direct demand cannot be made on an employee if tax was deducted by the employer. | Click Here |
For More :- Read IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 30.01.2026