IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 31.05.2025
| Section/Notification | Case Law Title | Brief Summary | Citation | Relevant Act |
| NOTIFICATION NO. 51/2025 AND NOTIFICATION NO. 50/2025, DATED 29-05-2025 | N/A | CBDT issued corrigendum to substitute Schedule 80-IE in ITR-3 and ITR-5 for AY 2025-26. | NOTIFICATION NO. 51/2025 AND NOTIFICATION NO. 50/2025, DATED 29-05-2025 | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 2(22)(e) | Krishan Kant Kohli v. DCIT Central Circle | Loan or advance from a partnership firm (not a closely held company) cannot be treated as deemed dividend. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 4 | PR. Commissioner of Income-tax I v. M. P. Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Ltd. | One-time charges recovered by electricity distribution company for laying power lines and acquiring infrastructure are capital receipts. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 11 | Guru Singh Sabha v. Income-tax Officer (Exemption) | Filing Form 10B tax audit report for section 11 benefit is directory, not mandatory; can be uploaded during appellate proceedings. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 12A, 80G | Sai Seva Sansthan v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) | Ex-parte orders rejecting 12A and 80G registration are set aside and remanded for fresh consideration to non-receipt of hearing notices. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 12AB | Setu Sansthan v. CIT (Exemption) Jaipur | Matter restored to Commissioner (Exemptions) for reconsideration of registration, as assessee was in process of applying under Rajasthan Public Trust Act. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 31, 37(1) | Shanti Bhushan v. Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi | Appeal disposed of as infructuous; expenses for coronary surgery of a lawyer not allowable under section 31 (not ‘plant’) or section 37(1) (no direct nexus with professional efficiency). | Income-tax Act, 1961 | |
| 54F | Income-tax Officer v. Narasimha Reddy Duthala | Section 54F exemption allowed as assessee met substantive conditions, with house transfers to daughter and under-construction house not counting as “more than one house,” and deposit made within extended due date. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 54F | Mrs. Ratan Mahendra Jain v. Income-tax Officer | Exemption under section 54F allowed for purchase of a duplex home by a single deed of transfer, as it is not considered two residential houses. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 68 | Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Event Developers (P.) Ltd. | Reopening notice justified as assessee failed to establish genuineness and creditworthiness of company providing bogus LTCG/STCG, found to be a shell company. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 68, 153C | Panch Tatva Promotors (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax | Reopening assessment under Section 153C is invalid if the incriminating material from a search pertains to an earlier financial year and not the relevant assessment year. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 70 | Teacher Retirement System of Texas v. ACIT (IT) – 4(1)(2) | Short-term capital loss (STT paid) can be set off against short-term capital gains (STT not paid). | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 80G | Gems Chamber of Commerce Association v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) | Matter remanded for one more opportunity to assessee to substantiate its case for 80G approval, as permanent registration under section 12AB(1)(b) was already granted. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 80G | Senior Citizen Council Gandhinagar v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) | Matter remitted to Commissioner (Exemption) to consider 80G application under correct sub-clause (ii) instead of inadvertently selected (iv) of proviso to section 80G(5). | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 80G | Aatman Foundation v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) | Matter remanded for de novo consideration; inadvertent error in filing Form 10AB (incorrect sub-clause for 80G approval). | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 220, IBC, 2016 | V S Texmills (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax | Income Tax Department demand not claimed in approved resolution plan under IBC stands extinguished. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961; Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 |
| 245 | Mediakind India (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax, CPC | Revenue authorities directed to refund entire amount in excess of 20% of demand when 20% already deposited and stay application filed. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| 249, CBDT Circular No. 20/2016 | Shrikunj Corporation v. Commissioner of Income-tax | Dismissal of appeal for delay unsustainable when manual appeal filed within statutory period and e-filed within extended time. | Click Here | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
Related Post
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAW 30.05.25
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 29.05.2025
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 28.05.2025
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 26.05.2025
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 23.05.2025
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 22.05.2025
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 21.05.2025
Improtant Income Tax Case Law 20.05.2025
34 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAW 19.05.2025
14 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 05.03.2025
29 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 04.03.2025
IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 03.03.2025
Income Tax Case Laws in February 2025
Income Tax Case Laws in January 2025