IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 03.03.2025
Section | Case Law Title | Brief Summary | Citation |
2(9) | Initiating officer v. Ramesh Chand Sharma | Provisional attachment order cannot be confirmed if the funds were not transferred by the alleged beneficial owner. | Click Here |
2(47) | M. S. Ananthamurthy v. J. Manjula | A sale deed executed by a general power of attorney holder after the original owner’s death is invalid if the POA and agreement to sell were not registered. | Click Here |
10(23C) | G.H.R. Educational Foundation v. Commissioner of Income-tax Exemption | An educational institution can be granted tax exemption even if it has other non-educational activities. Section 10(23C)(vi) Approval Remanded; Potential Activities Not Grounds for Rejection | Click Here |
14A | Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Principal CIT | No disallowance under section 14A is required if there is no other source of exempt income. | Click Here |
37(1) | Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Principal CIT | Interest and penalty paid on account of non-payment of additional license fee are revenue expenditure. | Click Here |
56 | Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Principal CIT | No addition under section 56 is required for the acquisition of a business through a demerger. | Click Here |
72A | Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Principal CIT | Loss carry-forward is allowed even if preference shares are issued to shareholders. | Click Here |
124 | Income-tax Officer-4(1) v. Bhagyaarna Gems & Jewellery (P.) Ltd. | Jurisdiction objections must be raised within the stipulated time. | Click Here |
127 | Income-tax Officer-4(1) v. Bhagyaarna Gems & Jewellery (P.) Ltd. | Assessment orders passed by an officer without proper transfer orders are invalid. | Click Here |
143 | Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. Travel Designer India (P.) Ltd. | The original return filing date determines the limitation period for assessment if Defects are removed . Section 143(2) Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Invalid; Defective Return Date Remains Original Filing Date | Click Here |
194IC | Income-tax Officer (TDS) v. N. Rose Developers (P.) Ltd. | Compensation paid for alternative accommodation is not subject to TDS under section 194IC. | Click Here |
195 | Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Principal CIT | No TDS is required on payments made to non-residents in non-treaty countries for communication charges and bandwidth charges. | Click Here |
234A | Seema Tripathi v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax | Interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C can be re-examined under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. | Click Here |
268A | Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-23 v. IPL Loan Trust | Revenue cannot pursue appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs. 2 crores. | Click Here |
271(1)(c) | AKM Resorts v. ACIT | Penalty cannot be imposed if additions are made based on estimated rates. |
Related Post
27 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 01.03.2025