IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 03.03.2025

By | March 15, 2025

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 03.03.2025

SectionCase Law TitleBrief SummaryCitation
2(9)Initiating officer v. Ramesh Chand SharmaProvisional attachment order cannot be confirmed if the funds were not transferred by the alleged beneficial owner.Click Here
2(47)M. S. Ananthamurthy v. J. ManjulaA sale deed executed by a general power of attorney holder after the original owner’s death is invalid if the POA and agreement to sell were not registered.Click Here
10(23C)G.H.R. Educational Foundation v. Commissioner of Income-tax ExemptionAn educational institution can be granted tax exemption even if it has other non-educational activities.

Section 10(23C)(vi) Approval Remanded; Potential Activities Not Grounds for Rejection

Click Here
14ABharti Airtel Ltd. v. Principal CITNo disallowance under section 14A is required if there is no other source of exempt income.Click Here
37(1)Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Principal CITInterest and penalty paid on account of non-payment of additional license fee are revenue expenditure.Click Here
56Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Principal CITNo addition under section 56 is required for the acquisition of a business through a demerger.Click Here
72ABharti Airtel Ltd. v. Principal CITLoss carry-forward is allowed even if preference shares are issued to shareholders.Click Here
124Income-tax Officer-4(1) v. Bhagyaarna Gems & Jewellery (P.) Ltd.Jurisdiction objections must be raised within the stipulated time.Click Here
127Income-tax Officer-4(1) v. Bhagyaarna Gems & Jewellery (P.) Ltd.Assessment orders passed by an officer without proper transfer orders are invalid.Click Here
143Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. Travel Designer India (P.) Ltd.The original return filing date determines the limitation period for assessment if Defects are removed .

Section 143(2) Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Invalid; Defective Return Date Remains Original Filing Date

Click Here
194ICIncome-tax Officer (TDS) v. N. Rose Developers (P.) Ltd.Compensation paid for alternative accommodation is not subject to TDS under section 194IC.Click Here
195Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Principal CITNo TDS is required on payments made to non-residents in non-treaty countries for communication charges and bandwidth charges.Click Here
234ASeema Tripathi v. Principal Commissioner of Income-taxInterest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C can be re-examined under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.Click Here
268APrincipal Commissioner of Income-tax-23 v. IPL Loan TrustRevenue cannot pursue appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs. 2 crores.Click Here
271(1)(c)AKM Resorts v. ACITPenalty cannot be imposed if additions are made based on estimated rates. 

Click Here

Related Post

27 IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE  LAWS 01.03.2025

Income Tax Case Laws in February 2025

Income Tax Case Laws in January 2025