Rent for Agricultural Land is Exempt from GST, Not Taxable as Real Estate Service.
Issue
Whether lease rent (or “quit rent”) paid to the State Government for land used for agricultural purposes (specifically, rubber cultivation) is taxable at 18% as a “Real Estate Service” (SAC 9972), or is it classifiable as a “Support Service related to agriculture” (SAC 9986) and therefore exempt from GST?
Facts
- The applicant, engaged in rubber cultivation, held 356 hectares of land on a perpetual lease from the Kerala Government.
- The applicant paid “quit rent” (lease rent) to the government through the Forest Department.
- An audit by the Accountant General triggered a demand from the Forest Department for GST at 18%, classifying the service under SAC 997212 (Real Estate Services).
- The applicant filed an advance ruling, contending that the land was used exclusively for agricultural purposes (cultivation of plants) and the service should be classified under SAC 9986 (Support services related to agriculture).
- The applicant argued that as an agricultural service, the rent was exempt from GST under Entry 54 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate).
Decision
- The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled decisively in favour of the assessee.
- It held that the quit rent is consideration for leasing land used for the cultivation of plants. This activity is correctly classifiable under SAC 998619 (Other support services related to agriculture).
- The authority ruled that the “Real Estate Service” classification (SAC 9972) was inapplicable to this transaction.
- It was held that the leasing of vacant land for the cultivation of plants (including rubber plantations) is explicitly covered by Entry 54 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate).
- Therefore, the lease rent collected by the Government for such agricultural use is exempt from GST.
Key Takeaways
- Land Use is the Decisive Factor: The classification of a land lease for GST purposes is determined by the end use of the land. Since the land was used for cultivation, it falls under the agricultural services head.
- Agricultural Land Lease is Exempt: Renting or leasing vacant land for any agricultural purpose, including the cultivation of plants like rubber, is specifically exempted from GST under Entry 54 of the mega exemption notification.
- Wrong Classification by Audit: This ruling shows that an audit objection (even from the AG) demanding tax under an incorrect classification (like Real Estate Services) can be successfully challenged and will not override the specific provisions and exemptions of the GST law.
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KERALA
The Vaniampara Rubber Company Ltd., In re
Jomy Jacob IRS and Mansur M.I., Member
No. KER/20/2025
JULY 1, 2025
Sabu C.J., Adv. for the Applicant.
PROCEEDINGS
1. M/s. The Vaniampara Rubber Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as the applicant) is a company engaged in the cultivation of rubber, registered under the CGST Act. The applicant holds 356.1232 Hectares of vacant land on perpetual lease from erstwhile Cochin State, now under the Government of Kerala for the cultivation of rubber plants.
2. In this Ruling, a reference hereinafter to the provisions of the CGST Act, Rules or the Notifications issued thereunder shall include a reference to the corresponding provisions of the KSGST Act, Rules or the Notifications issued thereunder.
3. The details of the questions on which advance ruling is sought are given above and are not being reproduced.
4. The contentions of the applicant:
4.1 The applicant submits that they have cultivated a rubber plantation on the land in question and have been paying quit rent or lease rent to the Government through the Forest Department. The issue prompting this application for advance ruling is the taxability of such rent paid for agricultural activities on the leased land. The Forest Department issued a notice to the applicant demanding tax arrears for the period from 2017-18 to 2023-24, based on an audit enquiry by the Accountant General, Kerala. The demand is grounded in the claim that the agricultural land leased to the applicant attracts GST at the rate of 18% under Section 7(1)(a), classified under SAC No. 997212.
4.2 The applicant submits that the Forest Department acted solely on the basis of the audit objection, and that no proceedings were initiated against them by the GST Department. The applicant further points out that the Kerala Authority for Advance Ruling has already clarified this issue in Cochin Plantations Ltd., In re GST 806/18 GSTL 836 (AAR – KERALA)/Order No. KER/11/2018, dated 20.10.2018, wherein it was ruled that quit rent or lease rent paid to the Kerala Government for land used for agricultural purposes falls under HSN 9986 and is eligible for exemption under GST. The applicant contends that this ruling is squarely applicable to their case and that the rent paid to the Government is therefore exempt from tax.
4.3. The applicant submits that the SAC classification proposed by the Accountant General under Heading 997212 pertains to real estate services, which is not applicable in the present case, as the land is used exclusively for agricultural purposes. The said classification relates to rental or leasing services involving own or leased non-residential property and does not cover land used for agricultural activities.
4.4. Further, it is submitted that “land,” being an immovable property leased for agricultural activities, cannot be classified either as goods or as services under SAC 997212 or 9973. The appropriate classification is under SAC 9986. The Government has exempted GST on intra-State supply of services falling under this heading, as per Entry No. 54 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28.06.2017. The exemption covers services relating to the cultivation of plants or agricultural produce by way of lease of vacant land, with or without a structure incidental to such use. It is also extended to support services related to agriculture, forestry, fishing, animal husbandry, and other similar activities.
5. Comments of the Jurisdictional Officer:
The application was forwarded to the jurisdictional officer as per provisions of Section 98(1) of the CGST Act. The jurisdictional officer, Tax Payer Services Circle, Kottayam Town submitted specific remarks that the vacant land leased from the Government is converting into rubber plantation and therefore the lease rent paid by the applicant is exempted from GST as per Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), Dated 28.06.2017. The officer has not reported any pending or decided proceedings against the applicant relating to the subject case.
6. Personal Hearing:
6.1 The applicant was granted an opportunity for a personal hearing on 19.05.2025. Shri Sabu. C.J, advocate represented the applicant in personal hearing. The representative presented the facts of the case in detail and requested to issue a ruling on the basis of the submissions made at the time of hearing as well as those submitted along with the application.
7. Discussion and Findings:
7.1 We have carefully examined the advance ruling application, the statement of facts, and the oral submissions made during the personal hearing. The applicant is engaged in the cultivation of rubber on land obtained through a perpetual lease from the Government of Kerala and pays quit rent/lease rent through the Forest Department. The issue for consideration is the appropriate classification of the lease rent paid to the Government whether it falls under SAC 9986 or 997212. The applicant also seeks clarification on the eligibility for GST exemption under Entry No. 54 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28.06.2017. Accordingly, the questions raised for a ruling fall within the scope of clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 97 of the CGST Act-namely, “classification of any goods or services or both” and “applicability of a notification issued under the provisions of this Act.” Hence, the application is admitted for consideration on its merits.
7.2 The first issue to be clarified is the appropriate SAC (Services Accounting Code) applicable to the quit rent paid by the applicant for land used for agricultural purposes (specifically, a rubber plantation), namely, whether it should be classified under SAC Heading 9986 or 997212. Although “quit rent” is not defined under any specific statute, it is generally understood in practice to be a levy imposed on government land leased out to private individuals for their use. In the present case, the applicant states that quit rent is paid to the Government of Kerala through the Forest Department for land used for agricultural purposes (rubber plantation). The applicant seeks a clarification on whether SAC 9986 or 997212 applies to this quit rent. From the application, it is evident that the land has been rented or leased by the Government to the applicant for agricultural use, and the quit rent is being paid in consideration for such leasing service. This service has squarely been classified under SAC 9986 under Notification No 11/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28-07-2017 which is as follows:
| SI.No. | Chapter | Description of Service | ||||||
| 24 | 9986 |
Explanation. – “Support services to agriculture, forestry, 1 fishing, animal husbandry” mean (i) Services relating to cultivation of plants and….. by way of-
|
7.3 Thus, under clause (d) above, renting or leasing of vacant land falls under SAC 9986. SAC 9972 pertains to real estate services and none of the sub-categories therein are found suitable to classify the quit rent paid by the applicant. Hence we are of the opinion that the quit rent paid by them is classifiable under SAC 9986.
7.4 The second question is whether lease rent collected by the Government through Forest Department is exempted from GST vide Heading 9986 of Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). In this regard, the exemptions under the said notification were verified and it is found that the same stands exempted under SI No. 54 of the said notification which reads as under-
| SI.No. | Service Code (Tariff) | Description of Services | Rate | Condition | |||
| 54 | 9986 | Services relating to cultivation of plants…..
| Nil | Nil |
7.5 Therefore, it is evident that the service involved herein is exempted under SI No 54 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28-06-2017.
7.6 To quote precedence we also find that the same decision was upheld by AAR, Kerala vide Order No. KER/ 11/2018, dated 20.10.2018.
8. In the light of the facts and legal position as stated above, the following rulings are issued:
RULINGS
Question 1: Whether the quit rent/lease rent paid to Kerala Government on the land used for agricultural purpose (Rubber plantation) be classified under SAC Heading 9986 or 997212?
Ruling: The quit rent/lease rent paid to the Kerala Government for land used for agricultural purposes (rubber plantation) is classifiable under SAC Heading 998619, with the service description-“Other support services related to agriculture, hunting, forestry, and fishing.”
Question 2: Whether lease rent collected by the Government through Forest Department is exempted from GST vide Heading 9986 of Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)?
Ruling: Yes, the lease rent collected from the applicant by the Government through the Forest Department, for the purpose of converting vacant land into a rubber plantation, is exempt from GST as per sub-clause (d) of the service description under Entry No. 54 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28.06.2017, as amended from time to time.