Contradictory Stands by Revenue Quashed: Allegation of “No Business Found” Cannot Co-exist with Demand for Tax Liability for Previous Years; Registration Restored

By | January 2, 2026

Contradictory Stands by Revenue Quashed: Allegation of “No Business Found” Cannot Co-exist with Demand for Tax Liability for Previous Years; Registration Restored   ISSUE Whether the GST Department can simultaneously sustain two contradictory allegations against an assessee: Cancelling registration on the ground that no business activity was found at the premises (fraud/suppression). Issuing a demand… Read More »

Category: GST

Kerala High Court Rules Section 16(5) as a Non-Obstante Clause; Allows ITC for FY 2017-21 if Returns Filed by Nov 30, 2021

By | January 2, 2026

Kerala High Court Rules Section 16(5) as a Non-Obstante Clause; Allows ITC for FY 2017-21 if Returns Filed by Nov 30, 2021   ISSUE Whether the denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) for the period 2018-19, based on the limitation period prescribed under Section 16(4), is sustainable in light of the subsequently introduced Section 16(5),… Read More »

Category: GST

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 02.01.2026

By | January 2, 2026

IMPORTANT INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 02.01.2026 Relevant Act Section Case Law Title Brief Summary Citation Income-tax Act, 1961 Section 11 Goswami Bhagwan Lal Education Society v. ITO Denial of exemption under Section 11 for non-filing of Form 10B without giving an opportunity to rectify the defect under Section 139(9) is a debatable issue and cannot… Read More »

Sudden Departure of Accounts Staff in Remote Location Constitutes “Genuine Hardship”; High Court Condones Delay in Filing ITR Rejected by PCIT

By | January 2, 2026

Sudden Departure of Accounts Staff in Remote Location Constitutes “Genuine Hardship”; High Court Condones Delay in Filing ITR Rejected by PCIT   ISSUE Whether the successive resignation of key employees handling accounts and tax compliances in a company located in a remote village constitutes “reasonable cause” and “genuine hardship” under Section 119(2)(b) for condoning the… Read More »

Department Cannot Retain Seized Jewellery for Joint Holder’s Tax Dues After Assessee Settles Own Liability under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme

By | January 2, 2026

Department Cannot Retain Seized Jewellery for Joint Holder’s Tax Dues After Assessee Settles Own Liability under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme   ISSUE Whether the Assessing Officer (AO) is justified in continuing to detain gold and diamond jewellery seized from a joint locker (held by the assessee and her mother-in-law) on the ground of outstanding demands… Read More »

Condonation of Delay Denied: Internal Dispute Between Directors is No Excuse for Late Filing when Returns for Adjacent Years were Filed on Time

By | January 2, 2026

Condonation of Delay Denied: Internal Dispute Between Directors is No Excuse for Late Filing when Returns for Adjacent Years were Filed on Time ISSUE Whether an inter se dispute amongst the directors of a company constitutes a “genuine hardship” under Section 119(2)(b) sufficient to condone a significant delay (30 months) in filing the Income Tax… Read More »

Search & Seizure: VDIS Declared Jewellery Cannot be Retaxed on Remaking; Section 115BBE Inapplicable to Estimated Business Income; Penalty u/s 270A Deleted Due to Statutory Bar u/s 271AAC

By | January 2, 2026

Search & Seizure: VDIS Declared Jewellery Cannot be Retaxed on Remaking; Section 115BBE Inapplicable to Estimated Business Income; Penalty u/s 270A Deleted Due to Statutory Bar u/s 271AAC   ISSUES Unexplained Investment (Jewellery): Whether jewellery found during a search at the premises of the assessee’s father and a third party can be added to the… Read More »

Reopening Quashed: Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) from ‘Penny Stock’ Accepted as Genuine where Assessee Incurred Losses in Same Scrip in Future Years

By | January 2, 2026

Reopening Quashed: Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) from ‘Penny Stock’ Accepted as Genuine where Assessee Incurred Losses in Same Scrip in Future Years ISSUE Whether the Assessing Officer (AO) was justified in reopening the assessment under Section 147/148 and treating the sale consideration of shares as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 solely based on… Read More »

Pharma Manufacturing: Replacement of Magnets in Pipelines and Spares for Effluent Treatment Plant Allowed as Revenue Expenditure

By | January 2, 2026

Pharma Manufacturing: Replacement of Magnets in Pipelines and Spares for Effluent Treatment Plant Allowed as Revenue Expenditure ISSUE Whether expenditure incurred on purchasing magnetic enclosures/bullets for removing contaminants in pipelines and for replacing parts of an Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP) constitutes capital expenditure (creating enduring benefit) or allowable revenue expenditure. FACTS Assessee: A company manufacturing… Read More »

Telecom Taxation: Variable License Fees Held Capital (Amortizable), While Spectrum Charges and KYC Penalties Allowed as Revenue Expenditure; No TDS on Prepaid Distributor Discounts

By | January 2, 2026

Telecom Taxation: Variable License Fees Held Capital (Amortizable), While Spectrum Charges and KYC Penalties Allowed as Revenue Expenditure; No TDS on Prepaid Distributor Discounts ISSUES Variable License Fee: Whether variable license fees paid under the New Telecom Policy 1999 are capital in nature (amortizable u/s 35ABB) or revenue expenditure. Spectrum Charges: Whether Spectrum Usage Charges… Read More »