Adjudication Order Quashed as SCN Failed to Specify Date, Time, and Venue for Personal Hearing

By | November 24, 2025

Adjudication Order Quashed as SCN Failed to Specify Date, Time, and Venue for Personal Hearing Issue Whether an adjudication order passed under Section 73 of the GST Act is legally sustainable if the underlying Show Cause Notice (SCN) merely stated that the assessee “may appear” for a personal hearing but failed to specify the actual… Read More »

Category: GST

Madras High Court Remands Matter Due to Computational Errors and Disregard of Proposal to Drop Demand

By | November 24, 2025

Madras High Court Remands Matter Due to Computational Errors and Disregard of Proposal to Drop Demand Issue Computational Errors: Whether an adjudication order passed under Section 74 of the GST Act is sustainable when it contains computational errors in the figures adopted for confirming the demand. Contradictory Order: Whether the order is valid if it… Read More »

Adjudication Order Quashed for Travelling Beyond SCN and Belated Passing (2-Year Delay)

By | November 24, 2025

Adjudication Order Quashed for Travelling Beyond SCN and Belated Passing (2-Year Delay) Issue Scope of Adjudication: Can an adjudicating authority pass an order confirming a demand under Section 74 (fraud/suppression) when the underlying Show Cause Notice (SCN) only initiated proceedings under Section 130 (Confiscation) and Section 122 (Penalty)? Natural Justice: Is an order legally sustainable… Read More »

Category: GST

Ex-Parte Order Quashed: Business Shutdown Treated as Bona Fide Reason for Non-Reply to Notices

By | November 24, 2025

Ex-Parte Order Quashed: Business Shutdown Treated as Bona Fide Reason for Non-Reply to Notices Issue Whether an ex-parte adjudication order passed under Section 73(9) of the CGST/KGST Act is legally sustainable when the assessee failed to file a reply to the Show Cause Notice (SCN) because the emails went unnoticed due to the shutdown of… Read More »

Category: GST

High Court Relegates Fraudulent ITC Case to Statutory Appeal; Writ Jurisdiction Declined Due to Complex Facts

By | November 24, 2025

High Court Relegates Fraudulent ITC Case to Statutory Appeal; Writ Jurisdiction Declined Due to Complex Facts Issue Whether the High Court should exercise its extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 to adjudicate a GST demand involving allegations of a massive fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) ring, or if the petitioner must be relegated to the… Read More »

Category: GST

IMPORTANT GST CASE LAW 22.11.2025

By | November 24, 2025

IMPORTANT GST CASE LAW 22.11.2025 Section / Rule Case Law Title / Subject Brief Summary Citation Relevant Act Rule 10A GSTN Advisory on mandatory furnishing of bank account details Taxpayers (other than TCS/TDS/suo-moto registrations) must furnish bank account details within 30 days of registration or before filing GSTR-1/IFF, whichever is earlier, to avoid suspension of… Read More »

Category: GST

Uploading SCN to ‘Additional Notices’ Tab Without Alert is Not Valid Service; Ex-Parte Order Remanded.

By | November 24, 2025

Uploading SCN to ‘Additional Notices’ Tab Without Alert is Not Valid Service; Ex-Parte Order Remanded. Issue Whether the uploading of a Show Cause Notice (SCN) and subsequent order solely under the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal—without sending an email/SMS alert or uploading it to the standard “Notices” tab—constitutes valid service… Read More »

Category: GST

Section 74 Invocation Quashed: Extended Limitation Requires Specific Allegation of Fraud

By | November 24, 2025

Section 74 Invocation Quashed: Extended Limitation Requires Specific Allegation of Fraud Issue Whether the extended period of limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act can be invoked to demand tax, interest, and penalty when the Show Cause Notice (SCN) and the adjudication order fail to specifically charge the assessee with fraud, willful misstatement, or… Read More »

Category: GST

Remand to Reclassify Section 74 Orders as Section 73 Notices for Amnesty Eligibility; 50% Deposit Ordered.

By | November 24, 2025

Remand to Reclassify Section 74 Orders as Section 73 Notices for Amnesty Eligibility; 50% Deposit Ordered. Issue Whether a taxpayer, against whom adjudication orders have been passed under Section 74 (alleging fraud/suppression) for multiple assessment years, can seek a remand to the Adjudicating Authority to re-examine the applicability of Section 74 versus Section 73, specifically… Read More »

Category: GST