Penalty Upheld for Mis-reporting of Income Due to Unjustified Deductions.
Penalty Upheld for Mis-reporting of Income Due to Unjustified Excess Chapter VI-A Deductions.
Brief Facts
The case involves two appeals by the assessee, Mahesh Tukaram Matkar, for Assessment Years (AY) 2017-18 and 2018-19, challenging the confirmation of penalty levied under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For AY 2017-18, the assessee, an employee in Bosch Company Limited, initially filed a return showing a total income of after claiming Chapter VI-A deductions of .
The case was reopened under Section 147 of the Act. In response to the Section 148 notice, the assessee filed a revised return, admitting a higher total income of and reducing the Chapter VI-A deductions to . This difference between the original and revised return amounted to , which the Assessing Officer (AO) determined was a mis-reporting of income due to an excess deduction claimed.
The AO initiated penalty proceedings under Section 270A for mis-reporting of income and levied a penalty of (being 200% of the tax on the under-reported income). The AO rejected the assessee’s explanation, noting that had the department not detected the under-reporting, the assessee might not have submitted the revised income. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC upheld the AO’s penalty order for both assessment years.
Citation Details
| Detail | Information |
| Case Name | Mahesh Tukaram Matkar Vs. ITO, Nashik |
| Tribunal | Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune Bench “A”, Pune |
| Coram | Shri R. K. Panda, Vice President and Shri Vinay Bhamore, Judicial Member |
| ITA Nos. | 2342 & 2350/PUN/2024 |
| Assessment Years | 2017-18 & 2018-19 |
| Date of Pronouncement | 27th October, 2025 |
Download PENALTY FOR WRONG DEDUCTIONS UPHELD