GST registration cancellation is to be revoked upon assessee filing returns and paying all dues,

By | June 3, 2025

GST registration cancellation is to be revoked upon assessee filing returns and paying all dues, including tax and interest already deposited, and any outstanding demand.

Issue:

When an assessee’s GST registration has been cancelled due to a failure to file GST returns, and the assessee subsequently deposits the requisite tax and interest and expresses willingness to file returns (even manually if allowed), whether the cancellation order should be revoked, provided the assessee complies with all outstanding obligations.

Facts:

  • For the period September 2023 to December 2024, the assessee failed to file GST returns for the prescribed period.
  • As a result, the assessee’s GST registration was cancelled.
  • The assessee submitted to the court that they were ready and willing to file the GST returns.
  • Crucially, the assessee had already deposited the requisite tax along with interest through the Electronic Cash Ledger (ECL), “as if returns would have been filed.”
  • The assessee sought permission to file GST returns manually.

Decision:

The court held in favor of the assessee. It ruled that since the assessee had already deposited the outstanding tax with interest (as if returns would have been filed), the assessee was to be permitted to file returns. It was further directed that if the returns were found to be in accordance with the law, and the assessee was further directed to pay any outstanding demand raised by the respondent authority, then the order of cancellation would stand revoked.

Key Takeaways:

  • Consequences of Non-filing of Returns: Failure to file GST returns is a serious non-compliance that can lead to the cancellation of GST registration.
  • Revocation of Cancellation – Conditions: Courts generally adopt a pragmatic and equitable approach to allow taxpayers to get their registrations restored, especially when they demonstrate a genuine intent to comply.
  • Deposit of Tax and Interest: The fact that the assessee had already deposited the outstanding tax along with interest through the Electronic Cash Ledger is a strong indicator of their bona fide intent to comply and regularize their status. This pre-payment signals a commitment to meet their tax obligations.
  • Permitting Manual Filing (Implicit): While the text explicitly says “sought permission to file GST returns manually,” the court’s direction to “be permitted to file returns” likely implies a direction to the department to facilitate this, either through the portal if possible, or manually if system constraints exist.
  • Conditional Revocation: The revocation of the cancellation order is conditional upon:
    1. The assessee filing the returns.
    2. The filed returns being in accordance with the law.
    3. The assessee paying any other outstanding demand raised by the authority.
  • “In favour of assessee”: This outcome is highly favorable to the assessee as it allows them to restore their GST registration, which is essential for business operations, by fulfilling their tax compliance obligations.
  • Importance of GST Registration: GST registration is vital for businesses to issue valid tax invoices, collect and pass on ITC, and maintain their supply chain. Hence, its restoration is a significant relief.
  • Flexibility in Compliance (Judicial Approach): In cases of genuine difficulty or belated realization and willingness to comply, courts often provide an opportunity for taxpayers to rectify their defaults, even if it involves going slightly beyond standard procedures (like manual filing).
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
Dharmesh Deshani (OPC) (P.) Ltd.
v.
Union of India
BHARGAV D. KARIA and P.M. Raval, JJ.
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5099 of 2025
MAY  9, 2025
Avinash Poddar and Ms. Anchal A. Poddarfor the Petitioner. Pradip D. Bhate and Archit P. Janifor the Respondent.
ORDER
Bhargav D. Karia, J.- Heard learned advocate Mr. Avinash Poddar for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Shrunjal Shah for respondent Nos. 4 to 5.
2. Learned advocate Mr. Avinash Poddar has filed affidavit of the petitioner to place on record a copy of the Electronic Cash Ledger to demonstrate that though the petitioner has not filed GST Returns from September,2023 to December,2024, tax liability has been duly computed by the petitioner based on the available record and transaction, and such liability has already been discharged by way of depositing the same in Electronic Cash Ledger by the petitioner. The said affidavit is ordered to be taken on record.
3. This petition is filed with the following prayers:
“a. Issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned show cause notice dated 09.01.2024 in Form GST REG-17 and order dated 09.02.2024 in Form GST REG-19 issued by Respondent NO.5 which is marked as Annexure B and Annexure C.
b. Issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned order rejecting the application of revocation dated 04.04.2024 in REG-05 which is marked as Annexure B.
c. Issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and to set aside the order passed in Form APL-02 dated 13.11.2024 passed by Respondent No.04 which is marked as Annexure G.
d. Issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, orders or directions, directing the respondents to forthwith restore the registration certificate of the petitioner.”
4. The basic contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner could not file GST returns for the prescribed period and as such, registration of the petitioner is cancelled by the respondent_pursuant to the show cause notice dated 09.01.2024 by order dated 09.02.2024 w.e.f. 30.09.2023 by invoking section 29(2)(c) of the GST Act as the petitioner has not filed returns thereafter.
5. Learned advocate Mr. Poddar submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to file GST returns as the petitioner has already deposited the requisite tax along with interest through Electronic Cash Ledger as stated in the affidavit filed by the petitioner which can be verified by the respondent-authorities.
6. Learned AGP Ms. Shah, on the other hand, submitted that if the petitioner is permitted to file the GST returns as required under section 29(2)(c) of the GST Act, the respondent authority shall process the same and determine the tax liability in accordance with the provisions of the Act after considering the deposit made by the petitioner in the Electronic Cash Ledger, as stated in the affidavit filed today.
7. Learned advocate Mr. Poddar for the petitioner submitted that if permitted, the petitioner shall file the pending GST Returns manually from 30.09.2023 till date within a period of two weeks from today.
8. Considering the above submissions that there is no other contention raised on behalf of the petitioner as well as the respondent and considering the fact that the petitioner has already deposited the outstanding tax with interest as if the returns would have been filed, in the interest of justice, the petitioner is permitted to file returns, as prayed for by the respondent authority and if the same are in accordance with law and the petitioner is further directed to pay outstanding demand, if any raised by the respondent forthwith, then in that circumstances, the order of cancellation shall stands revoked.
The petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs.