Refund of Pre-GST (VAT Regime) Taxes Ordered Under Transitional Provisions
Issue: Can a taxpayer claim a refund of taxes collected during the pre-GST (VAT) regime that were not refunded under the old system, even after the transition to GST?
Facts:
- The assessee had a pending refund claim from the VAT regime.
- Part of this amount was adjusted against the assessee’s VAT liabilities, but the remaining amount was still with the tax department.
- After the transition to GST, the assessee sought a refund of this remaining amount.
Decision:
- The court acknowledged that under the GST regime, there is no specific mechanism for refunding taxes collected under the previous VAT regime.
- However, considering the transitional provisions and the fact that the amount was rightfully due to the assessee, the court ordered the tax department to refund the remaining amount along with applicable interest.
- The court also directed that the refund should be processed within 12 weeks.
Key Takeaways:
- This case highlights the importance of transitional provisions in ensuring a smooth shift between tax regimes and addressing any pending dues from the previous system.
- Even though the GST law does not explicitly provide for refunds of pre-GST taxes, the court recognized the taxpayer’s right to claim such refunds based on the principles of fairness and equity.
- This decision provides a precedent for taxpayers seeking refunds of taxes collected under the previous VAT regime that remain unpaid after the transition to GST.
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Aparnaa Sarees (P.) Ltd.
v.
State of West Bengal
T.S. SIVAGNANAM, CJ.
and Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.
and Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.
R.V.W. 266 of 2024
I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2024
W.P.T.T. 60 of 2012
I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2024
W.P.T.T. 60 of 2012
JANUARY 14, 2025
Debanuj Basu Thakur, Atish Chakraborty for the Applicant. Anirban Ray, Md. T. M. Siddiqui, Tanoy Chakraborty, Saptak Sanyal for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. This review application has been filed by Aparnaa Sarees Private Limited to review the order passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench dated January 18, 2013 on the ground that as per the direction issued by the Hon’ble Division Bench, a portion of the amount to be refunded to the review applicant has been adjusted against the payments towards the Value Added Tax and the remaining amount is still lying with the department and after coming into force of the GST regime, there is no mechanism for adjustment and therefore, the review applicant prays for appropriate modification of the judgment and order.
2. It is not disputed by the respondents/revenue that there is no mechanism for refund of the amount, which was collected from the assessee during the VAT regime after coming into force of the G.S.T. regime.
3. Therefore, the judgment and order dated 18th January, 2013 is modified by directing the respondent authorities to refund the amount, which is lying with the department alongwith interest as ordered by the Hon’ble Division Bench less the amount, which has already been adjusted and such refund shall be effected within 12 weeks from the date of receipt of server copy of this order.
4. With the above observations/directions, review application is disposed of.
5. No costs.
6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities.