The Supreme Court allowed a company a share issue expenditure under section 35D, and also allowed a bonus expenditure, even though the bonus amount was deposited in a trust and, at the end of a dispute with employees, was paid over to them. The case is: Shasun Chemicals and Drugs Ltd. Read KPMG an October 2016 report [PDF 337 KB]
Can not find what you are looking ? Try Google Search….
Dont Forget to Subscribe for Latest Updates and News
Recent Posts
- AO Must Refer Valuation to DVO When Registered Valuer’s Report is Disputed.
- Settlement of Foreign Patent Dispute is a Deductible Business Expense, Not a Penalty
- Reopening an assessment after four years is invalid without new material or proof of the assessee’s failure to disclose.
- Rejection of Suo Motu 14A Disallowance on Mere Presumptions is Invalid.
- Late Filing of Audit Report Not Fatal if Done Before Assessment is Completed.
- ITAT Quashes Presumptive Income Addition Made in Limited Scrutiny
- IMPORTANT GST CASE LAWS 29.10.2025
- HC Directs Authority to First Decide on SCN Rectification Before Adjudication.
- Bail is the Norm in GST Fraud Cases Once Investigation Against Applicant is Complete.
- HC Directs Assessee to Appeal, Declines Writ Petition Against Confiscation Order.
TaxHeal