Tag Archives: Anil Laul v. Income-tax Officer

Reassessment invalid if not proved that advance received was undisclosed income : ITAT

By | August 27, 2018

mere fact that the assessee had received this advance does not imply, or even suggest, that it constitutes an income which has escaped assessment. IN THE ITAT DELHI BENCH ‘A’ Anil Laul v. Income-tax Officer, Ward 38 (1), New Delhi PRAMOD KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT APPEAL NO. 566 (DELHI) OF 2011… Read More »