<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GST CASE LAWS 25.09.2026 Archives - Tax Heal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.taxheal.com/tag/gst-case-laws-25-09-2026/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.taxheal.com/tag/gst-case-laws-25-09-2026</link>
	<description>Complete Guide for Income Tax and GST in India</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 09:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>GST CASE LAWS 25.09.2026</title>
		<link>https://www.taxheal.com/gst-case-laws-25-09-2026.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashwani Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 09:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 different gst case laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Famous gst case laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Case Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST CASE LAWS 25.09.2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST case laws book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gst case laws digest 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gst case laws for free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST case laws Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gst case laws supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gst itc case laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST law online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest case laws in gst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest gst case laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest gst case laws 2026]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.taxheal.com/?p=141537</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>GST CASE LAWS 25.09.2026 &#160; Relevant Act Section Case Law Title Brief Summary Citation Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 9 Goutam Engineering Concern v. West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. Services completed before the introduction of GST (in 2015) cannot be brought under the GST regime merely due to subsequent billing… <span class="read-more"><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/gst-case-laws-25-09-2026.html">Read More &#187;</a></span></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 style="text-align: center;">GST CASE LAWS 25.09.2026</h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="model-response-message-contentr_408d730036804c2b" class="markdown markdown-main-panel md-content enable-luminous-fast-follows enable-updated-hr-color tutor-markdown-rendering" dir="ltr" aria-busy="false" aria-live="polite">
<table data-path-to-node="2">
<thead>
<tr>
<td><strong>Relevant Act</strong></td>
<td><strong>Section</strong></td>
<td><strong>Case Law Title</strong></td>
<td><strong>Brief Summary</strong></td>
<td><strong>Citation</strong></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,1,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="2,1,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,1,1,0">Section 9</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,1,2,0">Goutam Engineering Concern v. West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd.</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,1,3,0">Services completed before the introduction of GST (in 2015) cannot be brought under the GST regime merely due to subsequent billing in 2019; withheld amounts must be released with interest after applicable pre-GST tax deductions.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/partha-sarathi-chatterjee-j.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,2,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="2,2,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,2,1,0">Section 17</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,2,2,0">Esnp Property Builder and Developers (P.) Ltd. v. State Tax Officer (ST)</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,2,3,0">Denial of ITC on inputs for constructing properties meant for lease or license requires fresh evaluation under the principles established in <i data-path-to-node="2,2,3,0" data-index-in-node="141">Safari Retreats</i>, which restricts blocked credit only to construction for own use or business premises.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/senthilkumar-ramamoorthy-j-33.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,3,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="2,3,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,3,1,0">Section 29</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,3,2,0">Rajinder Parshad Goel and Sons HUF v. Superintendent, CGST</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,3,3,0">Retrospective cancellation of GST registration without a Show Cause Notice proposing retrospective effect is unsustainable in law and liable to be quashed.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/and-rohit-kapoor-j-3.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,4,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="2,4,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,4,1,0">Section 54</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,4,2,0">Ajit Kumar Minz v. B.L. Agro Industries Ltd.</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,4,3,0">Supplementary differential ITC refund claims re-filed following formula changes are maintainable within limitation, as procedural or technical objections cannot override substantive entitlements under Section 54 and Rule 89.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/and-arvind-kumar-technical-member-6.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,5,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="2,5,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,5,1,0">Section 79</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,5,2,0">Esnp Property Builder and Developers (P.) Ltd. v. State Tax Officer (ST)</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,5,3,0">Recovery of amounts from electronic cash and credit ledgers without a pre-recovery intimation in FORM GST DRC-01D or observing the statutory 7-day payment window violates Rule 142B, entitling the taxpayer to restoration of debited funds.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/senthilkumar-ramamoorthy-j-33.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,6,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="2,6,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,6,1,0">Section 107</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,6,2,0">VA Tech Wabag Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, Salt Lake</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,6,3,0">Dismissing an appeal on limitation grounds when delay was caused by a manager&#8217;s severe illness—and where mandatory pre-deposit was paid—is hyper-technical; delay deserves condonation for a merit-based hearing.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/and-ms-ratna-dasgupta-accountant-member-3.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,7,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="2,7,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,7,1,0">Section 112</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,7,2,0">Aakash Gupta v. Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,7,3,0">Pre-deposit requirements cannot be applied retrospectively to appeals arising from penalty-only Show Cause Notices issued prior to the introduction of the pre-deposit condition.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/anil-kshetrapal-and-ms-shail-jain-jj-11.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,8,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="2,8,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,8,1,0">Section 169</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,8,2,0">Tahir Khan v. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue/WBGST, Government of West Bengal</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,8,3,0">Merely uploading an SCN and order under the &#8216;Additional Notices and Orders&#8217; tab without separate intimation or granting a personal hearing violates principles of natural justice, requiring the order to be quashed.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/smita-das-de-j-21.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,9,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="2,9,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,9,1,0">Section 169</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,9,2,0">Ved Enterprises v. State of U.P.</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="2,9,3,0">Uploading a Show Cause Notice solely to the GST portal after the cancellation of the taxpayer&#8217;s registration without alternative service is improper, violating natural justice principles.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/alok-mathur-and-amitabh-kumar-rai-jj-4.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="attachment-container search-images"></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
