<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 29.09.20226 Archives - Tax Heal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.taxheal.com/tag/income-tax-case-laws-29-09-20226/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.taxheal.com/tag/income-tax-case-laws-29-09-20226</link>
	<description>Complete Guide for Income Tax and GST in India</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 07:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 29.09.20226</title>
		<link>https://www.taxheal.com/income-tax-case-laws-29-09-20226.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashwani Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 07:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 different gst case laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Famous gst case laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Famous income tax cases in india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Case Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST case laws book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gst case laws digest 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gst case laws for free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST case laws Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gst case laws supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gst itc case laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST law online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax case laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income tax case laws 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 29.09.20226]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income tax case laws in india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax case laws Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income tax case laws section wise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest case laws in gst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest case laws in income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest gst case laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest gst case laws 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxheal income tax case laws]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.taxheal.com/?p=141928</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 29.09.20226 &#160; Section Relevant Act Case Law Title Brief Summary Citation Section 139(1) Income-tax Act, 1961 CBDT Press Release Extended due dates for filing tax audit reports (from Sept 30 to Oct 21, 2026) and Income Tax Returns (from Oct 31 to Nov 21, 2026) for AY 2026-27 for audited taxpayers.… <span class="read-more"><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/income-tax-case-laws-29-09-20226.html">Read More &#187;</a></span></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 style="text-align: center;">INCOME TAX CASE LAWS 29.09.20226</h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="model-response-message-contentr_463ad83cb67e8ed1" class="markdown markdown-main-panel md-content enable-luminous-fast-follows enable-updated-hr-color tutor-markdown-rendering" dir="ltr" aria-busy="false" aria-live="polite">
<table data-path-to-node="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<td><strong>Section</strong></td>
<td><strong>Relevant Act</strong></td>
<td><strong>Case Law Title</strong></td>
<td><strong>Brief Summary</strong></td>
<td><strong>Citation</strong></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,1,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,1,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 139(1)</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,1,1,0">Income-tax Act, 1961</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,1,2,0">CBDT Press Release</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,1,3,0">Extended due dates for filing tax audit reports (from Sept 30 to Oct 21, 2026) and Income Tax Returns (from Oct 31 to Nov 21, 2026) for AY 2026-27 for audited taxpayers.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/cbdt-extends-due-dates-for-filing-tax-audit-reports-and-itrs.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,2,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,2,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 2(47)</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,2,1,0">Income-tax Act, 1961</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,2,2,0">Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central v. Bileshivale Muddanna Govardhana Murthy</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,2,3,0">Where a Joint Development Agreement and related documents do not amount to a &#8216;transfer&#8217; under Section 2(47) read with Section 53A of TPA, capital gains tax is not attracted.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/and-k-s-hemalekha-j-2.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,9,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,9,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 10(23C)</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,9,1,0">Income-tax Act, 1961</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,9,2,0">Nagarji Navyuvak Sanstha v. Income-tax Officer, Exemption</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,9,3,0">An intimation issued under Section 143(1) after the commencement of scrutiny under Section 143(2) is legally void, rendering a subsequent assessment order under Section 143(3) unsustainable.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/sudhanshu-srivastava-judicial-member.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,10,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,10,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 22</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,10,1,0">Income-tax Act, 1961</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,10,2,0">Mukul Rohatgi v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,10,3,0">Revision under Section 263 for notional Annual Letting Value (ALV) is unsustainable where properties are disclosed as exclusively used for professional purposes or no longer owned.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/and-sanjay-awasthi-accountant-member-6.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,11,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,11,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 37(1)</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,11,1,0">Income-tax Act, 1961</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,11,2,0">ACIT v. Vodafone Idea Ltd.</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,11,3,0">Estimated disallowance of forex fluctuation loss on capital asset imports is unjustified when actual figures are available showing expenditure pertained to spares and consumables.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/and-jagadish-accountant-member-18.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,12,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,12,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 37(1)</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,12,1,0">Income-tax Act, 1961</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,12,2,0">ACIT v. Vodafone Idea Ltd.</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,12,3,0">Payment made for closure of a business division (Paging Division) is incurred for shutting down a business segment, not for carrying on business, and is thus not allowable under Section 37(1).</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/and-jagadish-accountant-member-18.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,13,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,13,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 41(1)</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,13,1,0">Income-tax Act, 1961</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,13,2,0">Vimal Oil and Foods Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,13,3,0">Reopening under Section 148 based on mere presumption of ceased trading liabilities for a company sold as a going concern under liquidation with no-dues certificates is unsustainable.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/a-s-supehia-and-ms-vaibhavi-d-nanavati-jj-58.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,14,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,14,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 68</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,14,1,0">Income-tax Act, 1961</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,14,2,0">Marvell Mall Development Company Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,14,3,0">Reopening/notice issued in the name of a non-existent amalgamating company post-amalgamation for income already assessed in the amalgamated company&#8217;s hands is void.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/a-s-supehia-and-ms-vaibhavi-d-nanavati-jj-59.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,15,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,15,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 69C</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,15,1,0">Income-tax Act, 1961</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,15,2,0">Korrun India (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,15,3,0">Rejection of fresh factual details by CIT(A) without examination required the matter to be restored to the AO for de novo adjudication with due opportunity of being heard.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/and-balakrishnan-s-accountant-member-10.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,33,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,33,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 132B</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,33,1,0">Income-tax Act, 1961</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,33,2,0">Dilavarsinh Harisinh Zala v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,33,3,0">A third-party claimant (&#8216;person concerned&#8217;) can apply under Section 132B for the release of cash seized during a search on another entity once tax liability is established.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/establishing-ownership-alone-does-not-warrant-seizure-release-pending-possession-assessment-but-third-parties-can-apply-under-section-132b.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,34,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,34,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 132B</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,34,1,0">Income-tax Act, 1961</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,34,2,0">Dilavarsinh Harisinh Zala v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,34,3,0">Mere proof of ownership does not entitle an owner to immediate release of cash seized from a firm where the cash forms part of business and assessment is pending.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/establishing-ownership-alone-does-not-warrant-seizure-release-pending-possession-assessment-but-third-parties-can-apply-under-section-132b.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,35,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,35,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 132B</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,35,1,0">Income-tax Act, 1961</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,35,2,0">Dilavarsinh Harisinh Zala v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,35,3,0">Automatic release of cash after 120 days without disclosure of nature and source is not mandatory; matter regarding procedural conditions referred to a Larger Bench.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/establishing-ownership-alone-does-not-warrant-seizure-release-pending-possession-assessment-but-third-parties-can-apply-under-section-132b.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,36,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,36,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 160</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,36,1,0">Income-tax Act, 1961</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,36,2,0">Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. Smt. Indira Kamineni</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,36,3,0">A beneficiary of a private family trust cannot claim a proportionate share of trust loss without mandatory prior legal determination/computation of the trust&#8217;s loss.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/and-madhusudan-sawdia-accountant-member-16.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,37,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,37,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 201</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,37,1,0">Income-tax Act, 1961</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,37,2,0">State Bank of India v. ACIT, TDS</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,37,3,0">An employer-bank cannot be treated as an assessee in default for not deducting TDS on LFC/LTC foreign travel reimbursements when an interim High Court order was operative.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/and-om-prakash-kant-accountant-member-20.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,38,0,0"><b data-path-to-node="0,38,0,0" data-index-in-node="0">Section 263</b></span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,38,1,0">Income-tax Act, 1961</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,38,2,0">Mukul Rohatgi v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax</span></td>
<td><span data-path-to-node="0,38,3,0">A revision show-cause notice and order issued by an officer acting as PCIT without explicit CBDT authorization post-promotion/posting are void for lack of jurisdiction.</span></td>
<td><a href="https://www.taxheal.com/and-sanjay-awasthi-accountant-member-6.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click Here</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
