GST Interest and Penalty Order Set Aside: Excess ITC Already Reversed

By | February 13, 2025

 GST Interest and Penalty Order Set Aside: Excess ITC Already Reversed

Summary in Key Points:

  • Issue: Was the order levying interest and penalty valid, given that the disputed excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) had already been reversed?

  • Facts: The petitioner filed GST returns and paid taxes. The department noticed a mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A, leading to a show cause notice (DRC-01A) and a personal hearing. Despite the petitioner’s reply and the fact that the excess ITC had been reversed in 2019, the respondent passed an order confirming the levy of interest and penalty.

  • Decision: The court held that since the petitioner had already reversed the disputed ITC, the impugned order was liable to be set aside. The order was treated as a show cause notice, and the petitioner was granted a reasonable opportunity to file objections.

Important Note: This decision highlights the importance of considering all relevant facts and circumstances before levying interest and penalties. The department’s failure to acknowledge the reversal of the excess ITC resulted in an unjust order. The court’s decision to set aside the order and provide the petitioner with an opportunity to present their case ensures fairness and prevents undue penalties. This ruling underscores the need for tax authorities to exercise due diligence and consider all relevant information before making a decision.

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
K.C. & Sons
v.
Deputy Commissioner (ST), GST Appeal
Mohammed Shaffiq, J.
W.P. No.38488 of 2024
W.M.P. Nos.41690 and 41693 of 2024
DECEMBER  20, 2024
Pranav Jain for the Petitioner. G. Nanmaran, Special Govt. Pleader for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 07.12.2023 on the limited ground that the impugned order suffers from violation of principles of natural justice inasmuch as it does not apply its mind to the material on record while confirming the levy of interest and penalty.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. During the relevant period 2017-18, the petitioner filed its returns and paid the appropriate taxes. On scrutiny of the returns, it was noticed that there was a mismatch between GSTR 3B and 2A.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that a notice in DRC-01A was issued on 02.05.2023 and another notice in DRC-01 with personal hearing notice was issued on 10.05.2023. Further, personal hearing was fixed on 21.06.2023. The petitioner had filed its reply on 09.05.2023, however the impugned order came to be passed on 07.12.2023, confirming the proposal.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the excess availed ITC was reversed in the year 2019, however the impugned order proceeds to levy interest and penalty overlooking the effect that the excess ITC which was availed has already been reversed as early as on 2019. It is further submitted by the learned counsel by the petitioner that portion of the interest which is demanded in the impugned order also stands paid.
5. Taking into account the peculiar facts of the case, wherein, the petitioner has already reversed the ITC which is in dispute, this Court is of the view that the petitioner may be granted one final opportunity to put forth his objections, which was not objected to by the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent.
6. In view thereof, the impugned order, dated 07.12.2023 is set aside. The impugned order shall be treated as show cause notice and the petitioner shall filed their objections within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If any such objections are filed within the stipulated period, the respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law after affording the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of hearing. If objections are not filed within the stipulated period, i.e., four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order of assessment shall stand restored.
7. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Category: GST

About CA Satbir Singh

Chartered Accountant having 12+ years of Experience in Taxation , Finance and GST related matters and can be reached at Email : Taxheal@gmail.com